Hashtag feminism in a blocked context: The mechanisms of unfolding and disrupting #rape on Persian Twitter

Abstract

Despite the growing body of literature on hashtag feminism in Western contexts, there is still a significant gap in our knowledge of the ways that feminist hashtag movements are developed in authoritarian societies. Moreover, we do not know much about the mechanisms by which a feminist hashtag movement is disrupted, particularly in non-democratic regimes. Drawing on and contributing to the hashtag feminism literature, we undertook a discursive approach to examine #rape on Persian Twitter to address these gaps. Findings showed that #rape was a space for Iranian users to share abusive experiences, but they went further to discuss barriers of disclosing sexual assault as well. Developing resistive strategies and raising awareness about other muted groups such as LGBTQIA+ were other discursive practices in articulating #rape. This article also pushes forward the existing literature on hashtag feminism by providing empirical analyses of the ways that a feminist movement is disrupted.

Bots Versus Humans: Discursive Activism During the Pandemic in the Iranian Twittersphere

“…Moreover, we pointed out that anti-regime narratives were the most ubiquitous networked frames on Persian Twitter. It reflected prior research on Persian Twitter (Azadi & Mesgaran, 2021;Kermani & Hooman, 2022;Kermani & Tafreshi, 2022;Khazraee, 2019) and in other nondemocratic societies (Nip & Fu, 2016;X. Zhao & Wang, 2023).…”

“…The regime seeks to silence any dissenting voices that do not align with its antagonistic, Islam-focused, and anti-Western discourse. Since the early days of blogging, Iranians have turned to social media to express their opinions, bypass government restrictions, share and access sensitive information, and challenge the regime’s dominant discourse (Kermani & Hooman, 2022). Twitter played a crucial role in the 2009 Green Movement by amplifying the protests and mobilizing citizens (Karimi, 2018).…”

Dilemmas Between Freedom of Speech and Hate Speech: Russophobia on Facebook and Instagram in the Spanish Media

“…At the same time, the academic tradition of the last five years focuses on certain forms of unnecessary censorship, especially on Instagram, which would unfairly allow certain inappropriate posts and censor publications. Progress on this censorship comes from social denunciation and originates advances, albeit slow, in social networks, which would still need more monitoring and surveillance by Meta, and more digital literacy on the part of users so that they detect hate and can proactively denounce and expedite these changes (Bernárdez-Rodal et al, 2021;Díaz-Altozano et al, 2021;Kermani & Hooman, 2022). This theoretical analysis also shows a broad, rigorous, and adequate academic tradition to the problems of each moment: Academic texts do cover many problems and details, even before ethics or legislation.…”

“…14). Numerous articles have analyzed how Instagram has focused too much on censoring supposedly erotic photographs (for example, female nipples, breastfeeding, breast cancer surgery), rather than pursuing quasi-pornographic, violent, or covert advertising posts (Chung & Wihbey, 2022;Ging & Garvey, 2018;Kermani & Hooman, 2022;Savolainen et al, 2022).…”

The significance of feminist infrastructure: #MeToo in the construction industry and the green industry in Sweden

“…Initiated in 2006 by Tarana Burke, it can be described as a “transformative politics of visibility” (Clark‐Parsons, 2019). Through digital campaigns with celebrities to draw attention, #MeToo has had a major impact since 2017, and the movement seems far from over as new petitions and #MeToo scandals flare up at regular intervals (See for exemple El‐Faizy, 2021; Local, 2021; Kermani & Hooman, 2022).…”