2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cse.2009.70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HASS: Highly Available, Scalable and Secure Distributed Data Storage Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a few distributed in-network data storage and retrieval schemes [Ye et al 2002;RatNasamy et al 2002;Zhang et al 2003;Newsome and Song 2003;Greenstein et al 2003;Li et al 2003;Ghose et al 2003;Desnoyers et al 2005;Fang et al 2006] have been proposed for efficient data management. In distributed in-network data storage schemes such as TTDD [Ye et al 2002], DCS [RatNasamy et al 2002;Newsome and Song 2003], TSRA [Desnoyers et al 2005], HybridS [Ren et al 2008], HASS [Xu and Jiang 2009], and ZettaDS [Liu et al 2008], the landmark-based information brokerage system [Fang et al 2006] and others Greenstein et al 2003;Li et al 2003;Ghose et al 2003], the data collected by a sensor node is stored either locally or at some designated nodes in the network, instead of transferred immediately to a centralized data center that is usually located out of the network. In our proposed work, a fully distributed data storage scheme is deployed, where the data collected are stored locally on individual nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a few distributed in-network data storage and retrieval schemes [Ye et al 2002;RatNasamy et al 2002;Zhang et al 2003;Newsome and Song 2003;Greenstein et al 2003;Li et al 2003;Ghose et al 2003;Desnoyers et al 2005;Fang et al 2006] have been proposed for efficient data management. In distributed in-network data storage schemes such as TTDD [Ye et al 2002], DCS [RatNasamy et al 2002;Newsome and Song 2003], TSRA [Desnoyers et al 2005], HybridS [Ren et al 2008], HASS [Xu and Jiang 2009], and ZettaDS [Liu et al 2008], the landmark-based information brokerage system [Fang et al 2006] and others Greenstein et al 2003;Li et al 2003;Ghose et al 2003], the data collected by a sensor node is stored either locally or at some designated nodes in the network, instead of transferred immediately to a centralized data center that is usually located out of the network. In our proposed work, a fully distributed data storage scheme is deployed, where the data collected are stored locally on individual nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New node can be added to the system for increasing storage capacity. DFS usually adopt security schemas for preventing data corruption and data stealing [4], [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, existing methods, e.g. (Gabber et al, 2003), (Xu and Jiang, 2009) barely address medical data management needs beyond the specific depart-ment's boundaries, while it is known that the patient medical folders are wide spread over many medical sites involved in the patient's healthcare. For this reason, many efforts have been done in last years to develop an interoperable infrastructure for digital health ((Cheung et al, 2009), (Freund, 2006)) by using semantic web concepts, even if the attention is mainly oriented to metadata sharing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%