2022
DOI: 10.5565/publmat6612212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hausdorff dimension and projections related to intersections

Abstract: For Sg(x, y) = x − g(y), x, y ∈ R n , g ∈ O(n), we investigate the Lebesgue measure and Hausdorff dimension of Sg(A) given the dimension of A, both for general Borel subsets of R 2n and for product sets.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was proven in [26]. The paper also contains dimension estimates for S g (A) when dim A ≤ n + 1 and estimates on the dimension of exceptional sets of transformations g. In particular…”
Section: The Projections S Gmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was proven in [26]. The paper also contains dimension estimates for S g (A) when dim A ≤ n + 1 and estimates on the dimension of exceptional sets of transformations g. In particular…”
Section: The Projections S Gmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The case dim A > (n + 1)/2 is a special case of Theorem 7; recall (29). The proof of the case dim A + (n − 1) dim B/n > n is based on the spherical averages and the first estimate of (26). Here is a sketch.…”
Section: The Projections S Gmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(8.1) D(S g# (µ × ν))(z) 2 dL n z dθ n g = c δ(µ)(t)δ(ν)(t)t 1−n dt, at least if µ and ν are smooth functions with compact support, see [M9,Section 5.2].…”
Section: Some Relations To the Distance Set Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All we need to do is to check the estimate (3.3), after that the proof runs as that of [M5,Theorem 4.1]. The qualitative version of (3.3) was given in the proof of [M6,Theorem 4.2]. We just have to check that that argument yields the upper bound we need.…”
Section: Intersectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%