2020
DOI: 10.1017/prm.2020.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hausdorff measure and Assouad dimension of generic self-conformal IFS on the line

Abstract: This paper considers self-conformal iterated function systems (IFSs) on the real line whose first level cylinders overlap. In the space of self-conformal IFSs, we show that generically (in topological sense) if the attractor of such a system has Hausdorff dimension less than 1 then it has zero appropriate dimensional Hausdorff measure and its Assouad dimension is equal to 1. Our main contribution is in showing that if the cylinders intersect then the IFS generically does not satisfy the weak separation propert… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, though 4‐dimension seems to be the upper limit of dimensionality, there is an infinite number of non‐integer dimensions, as exemplified by Hausdorff or Assouad dimensions. [ 149 ] Nature is filled with such generative dimensions. Just like proteins are with primary, secondary tertiary, or even higher order structures, stretchable electronics can also form multiscale hierarchical structures with distinct mechanical or functional designs at each scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, though 4‐dimension seems to be the upper limit of dimensionality, there is an infinite number of non‐integer dimensions, as exemplified by Hausdorff or Assouad dimensions. [ 149 ] Nature is filled with such generative dimensions. Just like proteins are with primary, secondary tertiary, or even higher order structures, stretchable electronics can also form multiscale hierarchical structures with distinct mechanical or functional designs at each scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%