2021
DOI: 10.1017/aaq.2021.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Havana Tradition Platform Pipe Production and Disposition: Implications for Interpreting Regional Variation in Midwestern Hopewell Ceremonialism

Abstract: This study documents the contexts of platform pipe creation, distribution, and disposition at Illinois Havana Hopewell Tradition (50 BC to AD 200–250) sites to identify regional variation in Hopewell ceremonialism and exchange. We observe that the large deposits of stone pipes buried during communal rituals in the Scioto Valley and the continued influence of the Hopewell Sphere of Interaction have skewed archaeological interpretation. Aside from the several large deposits, pipes are limited in the Scioto Tradi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This early position of Tremper fits with most previous analyses based on stylistic and trait list similarities (e.g., Prufer 1968:148–149; Ruhl 1996; Seeman 1977; Shetrone and Greenman 1931:493; Webb and Snow 1945:204–217; see also Gehlback 1988), and also, with gorget and pipe styles from Tremper that occur in early Havana Hopewellian contexts to the west (Farnsworth 2004:414; Farnsworth et al 2016; Meinkoth 1995:55; Tankersley et al 1990:223–224). At Tremper, in contrast to Mound City, most of the platform pipes were made of exotic western Illinois Sterling pipestone and Minnesota catlinite, and they equally mark the introduction of new platform pipe styles with deeper temporal roots in the Illinois Valley (Emerson et al 2013; Farnsworth et al 2021). The large physical size of crematory basins at both Tremper and Mound City (when compared with earlier individual inhumations and, later, smaller Hopewell basins) and their associated secondary cremains and offerings indicate that rituals and their presumed tie to community identities were probably broadening at this early time, as does the increased value placed on extraregional preciosities worked into objects of consistent style.…”
Section: Interpreting Findings and Ohio Hopewell Chronologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This early position of Tremper fits with most previous analyses based on stylistic and trait list similarities (e.g., Prufer 1968:148–149; Ruhl 1996; Seeman 1977; Shetrone and Greenman 1931:493; Webb and Snow 1945:204–217; see also Gehlback 1988), and also, with gorget and pipe styles from Tremper that occur in early Havana Hopewellian contexts to the west (Farnsworth 2004:414; Farnsworth et al 2016; Meinkoth 1995:55; Tankersley et al 1990:223–224). At Tremper, in contrast to Mound City, most of the platform pipes were made of exotic western Illinois Sterling pipestone and Minnesota catlinite, and they equally mark the introduction of new platform pipe styles with deeper temporal roots in the Illinois Valley (Emerson et al 2013; Farnsworth et al 2021). The large physical size of crematory basins at both Tremper and Mound City (when compared with earlier individual inhumations and, later, smaller Hopewell basins) and their associated secondary cremains and offerings indicate that rituals and their presumed tie to community identities were probably broadening at this early time, as does the increased value placed on extraregional preciosities worked into objects of consistent style.…”
Section: Interpreting Findings and Ohio Hopewell Chronologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even as conversations about collaboration, decolonization, and antiracism are deepening and the hiring landscape around diversity and representation are shifting, an overview of the publications on archaeology in North America in 2021 reveals that more‐traditional archaeological scholarship continues apace. Many of the articles published about the archaeological histories of Indigenous places have no mention of collaboration or involvement of Indigenous peoples in the work itself (e.g., Arkush and Arkush 2021; Barkwill Love 2021; Capps and Jones 2021; Dolan and Shackley 2021; Farnsworth, Emerson, and Hughes 2021). What remains unclear in these publications is whether collaboration existed and is not mentioned or no collaboration was present, suggesting that journal editors need to explore how to ensure that collaborative methods and relationships are integrated into publications.…”
Section: The “Decolonizing Generation”mentioning
confidence: 99%