2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Have we underestimated the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
271
0
36

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
9
271
0
36
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed differences in catecholamines in urine collected on-farm and after slaughter could be a consequence Stress reactivity in steers fed A. Karroo of ante mortem physical stressors such as hunger, thirst, fatigue, noise (Micera et al, 2007;Ferguson and Warner, 2008) and/or psychological stressors during transportation and at slaughter, which include restraint, manipulation, sudden change of environment and social disturbances (Gregory, 2008;Nanni Costa, 2009). To efficiently reduce ante-mortem stress, it could be important to measure its sources (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observed differences in catecholamines in urine collected on-farm and after slaughter could be a consequence Stress reactivity in steers fed A. Karroo of ante mortem physical stressors such as hunger, thirst, fatigue, noise (Micera et al, 2007;Ferguson and Warner, 2008) and/or psychological stressors during transportation and at slaughter, which include restraint, manipulation, sudden change of environment and social disturbances (Gregory, 2008;Nanni Costa, 2009). To efficiently reduce ante-mortem stress, it could be important to measure its sources (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequences of these stressors range from weight loss and death to impaired carcass and meat quality (Foury et al, 2005;Nanni Costa, 2009). The magnitude of any negative effect is a function of the type, duration and intensity of the individual stressors, production system and susceptibility of each individual animal to stress (Ferguson and Warner, 2008;Terlouw et al, 2008). The susceptibility of the individual animal to stress is, in particular, influenced by genetics (Ndlovu et al, 2008;Muchenje et al, 2009;O' Neill et al, 2009) and nutrition (Schaefer et al, 2001;Lowe et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an animal welfare standpoint, animals slaughtered without any form of stunning remains a contentious issue (Grandin, 2010) because the procedure is likely to cause pain (Ferguson and Warner, 2008, Gibson et al, 2009, Mellor, Gibson & Johnson, 2009, Grandin, 2010. It is against this backdrop that the Humane Slaughter Act (1958) and the European Council Regulation, EC1099/2009 require the stunning of all animals before slaughter, except where slaughter is done on religious grounds.…”
Section: The Halal Stunning Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of muscle glycogen at slaughter is a function of the 62 concentration of glycogen on-farm prior to mustering minus the quantity used during the pre-63 slaughter period. The effect of stress and muscle contraction during the pre-slaughter period 64 on glycogenolysis is well quantified (Ferguson and Warner 2008), however the variability in 65 the incidence of dark cutting due to seasonal nutritional variation in Australian production 66 systems is not. Knee et al (2004) showed that seasonal variation in feed quality influenced 67 muscle glycogen concentration in the M. semimembranosus and M. semitendinosus which is 68 the predicted cause for variation in the incidence of dark cutting.…”
Section: Thompson 2002) 59 60mentioning
confidence: 99%