2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Having less, giving more? Two preregistered replications of the relationship between social class and prosocial behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
60
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason why these behavioral experiments give mixed results is unclear, but several explanations have been put forward. First, some of these studies have small sample sizes, which may explain, for example, why Piff et al [41], who found a positive relation between environmental adversity and cooperation, was not replicated in a high-powered pre-registered study [42]. Second, these studies usually only use one economic game, which may lower their generalizability [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason why these behavioral experiments give mixed results is unclear, but several explanations have been put forward. First, some of these studies have small sample sizes, which may explain, for example, why Piff et al [41], who found a positive relation between environmental adversity and cooperation, was not replicated in a high-powered pre-registered study [42]. Second, these studies usually only use one economic game, which may lower their generalizability [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When cooperation is measured using behavioral experiments (i.e., economic games and actual behavior in various settings under scrutiny of the experimenter), the results are much more mixed. Some studies report an association between adverse environments and decreased cooperation [ 33 , 34 , 36 38 ], but other studies find the opposite pattern [ 39 41 ] or no effect at all [ 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in two studies that replicated Piff et al's (2010) Study 1 and Study 2, results revealed that measuring socioeconomic status was not related to dictator game performance and individuals' attitudes towards charitable donations. And what is even more interesting was that individuals primed in the upper subjective status gave a higher proportion of their annual income to charity (Stamos, Lange, Huang, & Dewitte, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they found that although reciprocity beliefs promote charitable giving for high-status individuals, feelings of gratitude foster charitable giving for low-status individuals. Finally, two high-powered and preregistered replication studies did not find evidence in support of the relationship between social class and prosocial behavior reported by Piff et al (2010;Stamos, Lange, Huang, & Dewitte, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%