2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Haynesville and Bossier mudrocks: A facies and sequence stratigraphic investigation, East Texas and Louisiana, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BIB-SEM investigations found that the majority of the visible porosity (N10 nm) is associated with inorganic and not with organic matter for these two shales (Klaver et al, 2015). The productive intervals are between 9700 and 15,300ft (3000-4600 m) and the main exploration and production efforts for these heterogeneous shales are focused in an area situated roughly along the center of the Texas and Louisiana border in the U.S. (Hammes and Frébourg, 2012).…”
Section: Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BIB-SEM investigations found that the majority of the visible porosity (N10 nm) is associated with inorganic and not with organic matter for these two shales (Klaver et al, 2015). The productive intervals are between 9700 and 15,300ft (3000-4600 m) and the main exploration and production efforts for these heterogeneous shales are focused in an area situated roughly along the center of the Texas and Louisiana border in the U.S. (Hammes and Frébourg, 2012).…”
Section: Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bossier and Haynesville shales comprise a number of different Upper Jurassic marine lithofacies ranging from argillaceous to carbonate-dominated as well as organic-rich to organic-poor mudrocks (Hammes and Frébourg, 2012). Typical TOC contents of the Haynesville shale are 3%, with porosity values ranging between 8 and 12%, ranging in vitrinite reflectance (VR r ) between 2.2 and 3% (Jarvie, 2012;Williams, 2009).…”
Section: Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although shale gas abundantly exists in boring "homogeneous" like fine-grained mudstone, it actually has obvious vertical heterogeneity in terms of lithofacies, mineralogy, petrophysics, gas content variation which determines the sweet spots, gas fairways, or producible areas of economic potential (Vecoli et al, 2009;Hulsey, 2011;Abouelresh and Slatt, 2012;Slatt and Rodriguez, 2012;Hammes and Fr ebourg, 2012). Many studies also have been carried out to figure out the controlling factors that lead to the vertical heterogeneity of shale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies also have been carried out to figure out the controlling factors that lead to the vertical heterogeneity of shale. These studies found that redox conditions, biological productivity, preservation, and relative sea-level change directly contributed to the vertical heterogeneity of shale (Algeo et al, 2004;Singh, 2008;Challands et al, 2009;Hulsey, 2011;Hammes and Fr ebourg, 2012;Slatt and Rodriguez, 2012). Because gas shales have historically been thought as homogeneous, understanding the vertical heterogeneity of shale has far-reaching implication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many shales, they are vertically stacked in systematic patterns rather than randomly distributed stratigraphically [29][30][31][32][33][34]. An upward decrease in API gamma-ray count from the base of an interval is the most common pattern on Barnett Shale gamma-ray logs; such a pattern is named a 'parasequence' [35] (Figure 9).…”
Section: Lithofacies Stacking and Sequence Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%