2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-017-0905-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hazard and risk assessment of earthquake-induced landslides—case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first of these methods, pseudo-static analysis, proposed that the earthquake force represents an additional permanent physical force to statically conservation equations [10]. Despite the fact that selecting a pseudo-static coefficient requires criterion and always yields conservative results, pseudo-static modelling is theoretically simple [11]. Following that, the stressdeformation assessment method was proposed as an extension of finite-element simulation that is capable of simulating slope dynamic deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of these methods, pseudo-static analysis, proposed that the earthquake force represents an additional permanent physical force to statically conservation equations [10]. Despite the fact that selecting a pseudo-static coefficient requires criterion and always yields conservative results, pseudo-static modelling is theoretically simple [11]. Following that, the stressdeformation assessment method was proposed as an extension of finite-element simulation that is capable of simulating slope dynamic deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those models, pseudostatic analysis was the first proposed, assuming that the earthquake force is a permanent body force added to static limit-equilibrium analysis [18,19]. Although pseudostatic analysis is conceptually simple, selecting a pseudostatic coefficient lacks criteria, and crude assumption always leads to conservative results [20]. Stress-deformation analysis, as an extension of finite-element modeling, was later developed and provided a valuable tool for modeling the static and dynamic deformation of slopes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few years, the accuracy of physically based models has been enhanced significantly with improvements in analyzing EQIL mechanisms. However, PBMs require a large number of parameter values, which limits their application in a large geographical area [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The substantial downside of the majority of approaches is the uncertainty regarding the earthquake scenario. Moreover, an accurate geomechanical model is difficult to build as the slope material parameters show not insignificant spatial and seasonal variability [14]. Deterministic, statistical, and pseudoprobabilistic methods are not able to take into account uncertainties caused by incomplete information about seismic and landslide processes and provide conservative estimates of seismically-induced landslide hazard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%