2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2004.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hazard criteria for wake vortex encounters during approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these scenarios, the heave axis perturbations feature heavily. Consequently, a measure or criteria based on flightpath may be a helpful adjunct in assessing severity; for fixed-wing wake encounters, steps have been made in this area [13] and this method could be adapted for rotorcraft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In these scenarios, the heave axis perturbations feature heavily. Consequently, a measure or criteria based on flightpath may be a helpful adjunct in assessing severity; for fixed-wing wake encounters, steps have been made in this area [13] and this method could be adapted for rotorcraft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [13] proposes that these encounters are known as 'navigate' go-arounds because the pilot is uncertain of position, or has lost the instrument tracking task, or it would be dangerous to attempt to re-acquire the flightpath. The alternative is an 'aviate' go-around where the go-around is initiated immediately because the disturbance is excessive.…”
Section: Vortex Severity Criteria Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…V to assess the quality of the VSM in comparison to the LES based simulation. Roll axis upsets and disturbances of the aircraft's vertical motion (e.g., changes in vertical speed and glide path deviations) are important parameters for the pilot's hazard assessment of a wake encounter during landing [17]. For example, the vortex-induced rolling moment coefficient was used as hazard metric to justify the separation scheme that was proposed by the International Re-Categorization Team for RECAT Phase 1 [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%