2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hazard of polystyrene micro-and nanospheres to selected aquatic and terrestrial organisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The above findings are consistent with the existing literature showing that significant excessive ROS were observed in C. reinhardtii , E. gracilis and C. vulgaris exposed to PS-NPLs with high concentrations ranging from 25 mg L −1 to ∼500 mg L −1 . 32,33,70 Interestingly, these previous observations showed adverse effects on microalgae when the NPL concentration was above 5 mg L −1 , 27,69 but in our study in a realistic freshwater environment (Lake Geneva water), smaller-sized PS-NPLs (20 nm) induced a significant ROS production at fairly low concentration (0.1 mg L −1 ). Moreover, 20 nm PS-NPLs induced more prominent enhancement of ROS production than larger-sized PS-NPLs (100 nm), and PS-NPLs exhibited 1.9–6.0 times higher ROS-inducing effect in Lake Geneva water than that in culture medium.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above findings are consistent with the existing literature showing that significant excessive ROS were observed in C. reinhardtii , E. gracilis and C. vulgaris exposed to PS-NPLs with high concentrations ranging from 25 mg L −1 to ∼500 mg L −1 . 32,33,70 Interestingly, these previous observations showed adverse effects on microalgae when the NPL concentration was above 5 mg L −1 , 27,69 but in our study in a realistic freshwater environment (Lake Geneva water), smaller-sized PS-NPLs (20 nm) induced a significant ROS production at fairly low concentration (0.1 mg L −1 ). Moreover, 20 nm PS-NPLs induced more prominent enhancement of ROS production than larger-sized PS-NPLs (100 nm), and PS-NPLs exhibited 1.9–6.0 times higher ROS-inducing effect in Lake Geneva water than that in culture medium.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…24,25 Unfortunately, only 1.34% of the 2540 exposure studies published until 2020 concerned the adverse effects of nano-and microplastics on microorganisms. 23,26,27 Some scattered evidence suggests that microbial taxa with different nutritional modes in freshwater microbial communities can actively interact with NPLs. For example, PS-NPLs reduce the cell viability, biomass and chlorophyll a concentration of freshwater microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus, 28 Microcystis aeruginosa, 29,30 Chlorella vulgaris, 31,32 and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii 33 and altered the metabolic diversity and functional structure of freshwater biofilms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global plastic pollution and the detection of micro- and nanoplastic particles in almost all environmental compartments and geographic regions has fuelled research into the possible effects of these particles on environmental organisms. One specific research question is whether nanoplastic particles exert specific and/or enhanced effects in organisms in comparison to microplastics [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. However, studies have reported different conclusions regarding this question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reviewed by ref. [ 1 ], there are also indications of size-specific effects depending on the type of organism. However, it remains to be elucidated which size classes need specific attention for hazard evaluation, and whether additional particle characteristics play a role in hazardous effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation