2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-006-0082-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hazard rate estimation of a mixture model with censored lifetimes

Abstract: This paper is intended to compare the hazard rate from the Bayesian approach with the hazard rate from the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) method. The MLE of a parameter is appropriate as long as there are sufficient data. For various reasons, however, sufficient data may not be available, which may make the result of the MLE method unreliable. In order to resolve the problem, it is necessary to rely on judgment about unknown parameters. This is done by adopting the Bayesian approach. The hazard rate of a mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimation of hazard rate functions is considered by [47] for two-parameter decreasing hazard rate distributions, by [23] for the inverse Gaussian distribution, by [34] for the linear hazard rate distribution, and by [1] for a mixture distribution with censored lifetimes. [47] use MLEs, [23] uses MLEs and UMVUEs, [34] use MLEs obtained via the EM algorithm, and [1] use MLEs and a Bayesian approach. Estimation of mean deviation is considered by [22] for the normal distribution and by [48] for the Pearson type distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimation of hazard rate functions is considered by [47] for two-parameter decreasing hazard rate distributions, by [23] for the inverse Gaussian distribution, by [34] for the linear hazard rate distribution, and by [1] for a mixture distribution with censored lifetimes. [47] use MLEs, [23] uses MLEs and UMVUEs, [34] use MLEs obtained via the EM algorithm, and [1] use MLEs and a Bayesian approach. Estimation of mean deviation is considered by [22] for the normal distribution and by [48] for the Pearson type distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, when using the Bayesian approach, it is necessary to employ both a likelihood function and a prior distribution to estimate the posterior distribution. A natural-conjugate prior distribution is employed as a likelihood function when they are of the same functional form [22][23][24][25]. Applying Bayesian statistics and using prior knowledge accumulated in previous stages of the design process, also helps to reduce the sample size required to meet a product's reliability specifications [11].…”
Section: Inference Method-bayesian and Non-bayesian Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we focus on the method proposed by Ahn et al (2007) to determinate the hyper parameters a, b, c and d of the Gamma prior, this technique is based on bootstrap method. We use same steps that Garthwaite et al (2004) and Ali et al (2013).…”
Section: Elicitation Of Hyper Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%