2022
DOI: 10.3390/foods11162453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hazard Ratio and Hazard Index as Preliminary Estimators Associated to the Presence of Furans and Alkylfurans in Belgian Foodstuffs

Abstract: This paper provides an estimation of the hazard related to the presence of furan and five alkyl furans (2- and 3-methylfuran, 2-ethylfuran, 2,5- and 2,3-dimethylfuran) in foodstuffs available in the Belgian market. To achieve this objective, a specific sampling plan was designed to ensure that the samples collected (n = 1003) represent the diversity of the Belgian food chain. Herein, the concepts of the Hazard Ratio of a sample (HRs) and the Hazard Index of a sample (HIs) were introduced to primarily character… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the process contaminants measured in this work, the highest mean concentrations were measured for 2-methylfuran (21000 µg/kg), followed by furan, 2,5-dimethylfuran and 3-methylfuran in the range between 5930 and 1041 µg/kg. These values are consistent with previously reported values (EFSA, 2017;Kettlitz et al, 2019;Alsafra et al, 2022). The median concentrations of other alkylfurans, thiophenes and acrylamide are all generally below 500 µg/kg.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…With regard to the process contaminants measured in this work, the highest mean concentrations were measured for 2-methylfuran (21000 µg/kg), followed by furan, 2,5-dimethylfuran and 3-methylfuran in the range between 5930 and 1041 µg/kg. These values are consistent with previously reported values (EFSA, 2017;Kettlitz et al, 2019;Alsafra et al, 2022). The median concentrations of other alkylfurans, thiophenes and acrylamide are all generally below 500 µg/kg.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Assuming this as the worst-case scenario, the estimation of non-carcinogenic health hazards due to the consumption of tomato fruits was determined by calculating the target hazard quotient (THQ) for individual detected PFAS (i.e., PFBA, PFPeA, and PFHxA) with the following equation (Kavcar et al, 2009): THQ i = C i x DI / RfD i , where C i is the i-PFAS concentration (mg g − 1 FW), DI is the average dietary daily intake per unit of body weight (BW) (g kg − 1 BW day − 1 ), and RfD i is the oral reference dose (mg kg − 1 BW day − 1 ) of the i-PFAS. The DI of raw tomato fruits for Italian adult population (DI = 1.16 g kg − 1 BW day − 1 ) was retrieved from the most recent version of the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database, available on the data.europa.eu website (https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/t he-efsa-comprehensive-european-food-consumption-database?locale (Alsafra et al, 2022). A HI < 1 indicates unlikely adverse effects due to PFAS exposure, while a HI ≥ 1 indicates that there is a potential risk to observe chronic non-cancer adverse effects on human health.…”
Section: Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%