Hazel grouse winter habitat selection and conservation in temperate forest

Rhim, Shin‐Jae

doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.028

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The vegetation coverage was classified into the following four categories based on the percentage of foliage cover in each vertical layer: 0 (percentage coverage = 0 %), 1 (1-33 %), 2 (34-66 %), and 3 (67-100 %) (Son et al 2017). As forb, shrub, and graminoid are the major forage resources for water deer (Kim et al 2011b), we measured the forb, shrub, and graminoid cover (%) within each of the circles (Rhim 2013, Hwang et al 2014.…”

Section: Folia Zool -67 (2018) Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecological factors influencing winter field sign abundance of Korean water deer Hydropotes inermis argyropus in a temperate forest in South Korea

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Folia Zool -67 (2018) Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecological factors influencing winter field sign abundance of Korean water deer Hydropotes inermis argyropus in a temperate forest in South Korea

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For every mode, MARK processed the Akaike information criterion corrected for a small sample size (AIC c ). Throughout the analysis, an information-theoretic philosophy of model selection was employed with a focus on multi-model inference (Burnham and Anderson 2002;Rhim 2013) that included habitat variables. Akaike weights (v) were determined for each of the variables that were present in at least one selected model.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characteristics of small mammal populations in thinned and clearcut stands in Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations

Kang

Son

Kim

et al. 2013

Forest Science and Technology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goal of this study was to gain an understanding of small mammal populations in thinned and clearcut stands in Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations on Mt. Maehwasan, Hongcheon, Korea. Foliage profiles, diameter at breast height distribution, coverage of ground, and volume of coarse woody debris were significantly different between thinned and clearcut stands. Total number of captured small mammals, number of captured striped field mice, and mean striped field mouse population densities obtained from Jolly-Seber estimates were higher in clearcut stands. Coverage of ground, volume of coarse woody debris, and number of downed trees were critical variables for abundance of small mammals in this study. Our results suggest that retention of coarse woody debris and downed trees prevent reduction of small mammal populations after forest practices in Japanese larch plantations.

show abstract

“…In European studies, pioneer trees was shown to be an important winter food and crucial habitat element for the Hazel Grouse (Bergmann et al 1996, Klaus 1996, Matysek et al 2019, Müller et al 2009a, Salo 1971, Schäublin & Bollmann 2011, Swenson 1993. Also, in South Korea, Hazel Grouse prefers forests rich in pioneer trees (Rhim 2013). Winter diet of the species in the Russian Far East depends on birch, willow, and alder in most of the areas (Potapov & Flint 1989).…”

Section: Sympatric Occurrencementioning

confidence: 99%

Habitat selection of sympatric Siberian Grouse and Hazel Grouse in natural and exploited forests of the lower Amur region

Ludwig

Siano²,

Андреев

2022

Ornis Fenn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Siberian Grouse (Falcipennis falcipennis), which is endemic to the “dark-needle” taiga of the Russian Far East, is one of the least studied grouse species in the world. We examined post-breeding habitat selection of Siberian Grouse and contrasted it with that of the better examined Hazel Grouse (Tetrastes bonasia) in two areas near Komsomolsk na Amure, Russia. To infer species-specific preferences, we used field sampling, logistic regression, and AIC model selection, and compared late summer habitats of Siberian Grouse and Hazel Grouse in a mountain- and hilly area in the dark needle taiga. Our study is the first to explain Siberian Grouse habitat relationships with an empirical modelling approach. Results indicate proportions of coniferous/ pioneer trees forest and rejuvenation to be the most important covariates separating Siberian and Hazel Grouse observation sites in forests from both areas. Siberian Grouse tended to select sites with low proportions of pioneer trees and rejuvenation but availability of dwarf shrubs. Bunchberry (Cornus canadensis) appeared to be of high importance for the presence of Siberian Grouse in both regions. Hazel Grouse were common in places dominated by pioneer trees with high canopy cover, and high proportions of grass/herb cover. Hazel Grouse also occurred more often in forest sites with dense vertical layering and rejuvenation. Modern forestry, which results in increasing amounts of forests at younger successional stages, is likely to favour the Hazel Grouse at the expense of the Siberian Grouse.

show abstract

Hazel grouse winter habitat selection and conservation in temperate forest

Cited by 6 publications

References 31 publications

Ecological factors influencing winter field sign abundance of Korean water deer Hydropotes inermis argyropus in a temperate forest in South Korea

Ecological factors influencing winter field sign abundance of Korean water deer Hydropotes inermis argyropus in a temperate forest in South Korea

Characteristics of small mammal populations in thinned and clearcut stands in Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations

Habitat selection of sympatric Siberian Grouse and Hazel Grouse in natural and exploited forests of the lower Amur region

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About