2022
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/tp6fy
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HBMIRT: A SAS Macro for Estimating Uni- and Multidimensional 1- and 2-Parameter Item Response Models in Small (and Large!) Samples (R1)

Abstract: Item response theory (IRT) has evolved as a standard psychometric approach in recent years, in particular for test construction based on dichotomous (i.e., true/false) items. Unfortunately, large samples are typically needed for item refinement in unidimensional models and even more so in the multidimensional case. However, Bayesian IRT approaches with hierarchical priors have recently been shown to be promising for estimating even complex models in small samples. Still, it may be challenging for applied resea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the hierarchical Bayesian approach combined with the bias correction procedure outlined in this paper directly contributes to a more accurate calculation of the information contained in an item bank, especially in small samples. This translates into advantages regarding ability estimates and was shown by Wagner et al (2022) . Typically, item calibration error is largest when calibration samples are small; as shown in this paper, however, smaller sample sizes are not associated with larger calibration errors when utilizing the hierarchical Bayesian approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, the hierarchical Bayesian approach combined with the bias correction procedure outlined in this paper directly contributes to a more accurate calculation of the information contained in an item bank, especially in small samples. This translates into advantages regarding ability estimates and was shown by Wagner et al (2022) . Typically, item calibration error is largest when calibration samples are small; as shown in this paper, however, smaller sample sizes are not associated with larger calibration errors when utilizing the hierarchical Bayesian approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%