2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.02.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HCPB TBM thermo mechanical design: Assessment with respect codes and standards and DEMO relevancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is completed, for some ITER specific aspects by ITER structural design criteria for in-vessel components (SDC-IC). In this work [5,6] the reference load cases and the related rules for the assessment were defined, identifying at the same time the missing rules and the lack of characterization for the TBM EUROFER structural material. Three different loading conditions (LC) have been studied; the first one corresponds to normal operation during a typical D-T phase plasma pulse (LC1), the second to the typical power excursion occurring during a MARFE event (LC2) and the third one corresponds to the accidental pressurization of the box in case of internal LOCA (LC3).…”
Section: Tbmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is completed, for some ITER specific aspects by ITER structural design criteria for in-vessel components (SDC-IC). In this work [5,6] the reference load cases and the related rules for the assessment were defined, identifying at the same time the missing rules and the lack of characterization for the TBM EUROFER structural material. Three different loading conditions (LC) have been studied; the first one corresponds to normal operation during a typical D-T phase plasma pulse (LC1), the second to the typical power excursion occurring during a MARFE event (LC2) and the third one corresponds to the accidental pressurization of the box in case of internal LOCA (LC3).…”
Section: Tbmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A correct evaluation of HTC in the manifold stages is important for the correct assessment of the TBM box structural behaviour. In the current design the rear region of the TBM box features high stresses [8] but secondary stress underestimation could be induced by implementing HTC values too far from the real ones. In the TBM design cycle with a simplified assumption (based on the Gnielinsky correlation) a constant HTC of 2000 W/m 2 K has been considered in the MF stages.…”
Section: Thermal Analyses Of the Manifold Stagesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The HCPB TBM design has been extensively described in [7][8][9]. The HCPB TBM features a box structure (EUROFER as structural material): the U shaped FW is closed along the poloidal direction by the lateral Caps; an internal structure of horizontal and vertical Stiffening Grids (hSG and vSG, addressed as sub-components together with the Caps) defines the volume allocation for the Breeder Units (BUs).…”
Section: Hcpb Tbm Design Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thereby the elements only relevant for the thermal 0920-3796/$ -see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.02.086 Recent works [4][5][6] focused on the thermo mechanical performance of the preliminary design of the EU HCPB TBM, developed since 2007 in vertical orientation. As the elastic analyses performed within these works highlighted several portions of the TBM box as being highly stressed in steady state and transient operation, designers have produced an improved TBM version trying to solve the structural issues.…”
Section: Finite Element Model Of Hcpb-tbmmentioning
confidence: 99%