1992
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91695-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HCV confirmatory testing of blood donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present data confirm the previous suggestion [3][4][5][6] that most of the observed core-indeterminate sera are attributable to false-positive reactions with the recombinant core antigen (C22-3 or equivalent). The use of synthetic peptides (in RIBA-3 or Monolisa anti-HCV, new antigens) or more strictly de fined recombinant protein fragments (in house antigen) of the core region appeared elucidive for discrimination.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…The present data confirm the previous suggestion [3][4][5][6] that most of the observed core-indeterminate sera are attributable to false-positive reactions with the recombinant core antigen (C22-3 or equivalent). The use of synthetic peptides (in RIBA-3 or Monolisa anti-HCV, new antigens) or more strictly de fined recombinant protein fragments (in house antigen) of the core region appeared elucidive for discrimination.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Since the introduction of a second-generation anti-HCV antibody enzyme immunoassays, the sensitivity for diagnosing HCV infection has increased significantly [McHutchison et al, 1992;Jeffers et al, 19921, and the specificity has been improved by the development of confirmatory tests such as RIBA2 [Boudart et al, 1992;Follet et al, 1991;van der Poel et al, 19911. This assay has recombinant antigens from the core region and the nonstructural (NS) regions (NS3 and NS4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is clear from a number of studies that the C100-3 EIA generated significant numbers of both false-positive and false-negative results , the latter being particularly common among donors without elevated levels of ALT. To ameliorate these problems, second-and thirdgeneration serological tests that include additional structural and nonstructural protein or peptide epitopes are currently being evaluated in both screening and supplemental (confirmatory) assays (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). These tests, like the first-generation test, rely on the detection of an antibody response to viral antigens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%