Immunotherapies, such as checkpoint blockade of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), have resulted in unprecedented improvements in survival for patients with lung cancer. Nonetheless, not all patients benefit equally and many issues remain unresolved, including the mechanisms of action and the possible effector function of immune cells from non-lymphoid lineages. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether anti-PD-1 immunotherapy acts on malignant tumor cells through mechanisms beyond those related to T lymphocyte involvement. We used a murine patientderived xenograft (PDX) model of early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) devoid of host lymphoid cells, and studied the tumor and immune non-lymphoid responses to immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 alone or in combination with standard chemotherapy (cisplatin). An antitumor effect was observed in animals that received anti-PD-1 treatment, alone or in combination with cisplatin, likely due to a mechanism independent of T lymphocytes. Indeed, anti-PD-1 treatment induced myeloid cell mobilization to the tumor concomitant with the production of exudates compatible with an acute inflammatory reaction mediated by murine polymorphonuclear leukocytes, specifically neutrophils. Thus, while keeping in mind that more research is needed to corroborate our findings, we report preliminary evidence for a previously undescribed immunotherapy mechanism in this model, suggesting a potential cytotoxic action of neutrophils as PD-1 inhibitor effector cells responsible for tumor regression by necrotic extension. Cancer immunotherapy, in particular antibody-based immune checkpoint blockers, represents a revolution in cancer treatment, generating unprecedented results in terms of overall and progression-free survival 1,2. Several of the most studied immune checkpoint targets, such as programmed cell death protein-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1 axis), are involved in escape mechanisms from immunosurveillance 2-4. Accordingly, anti-PD-1 therapies (e.g., nivolumab) are based on improving the anti-tumor immune response against cancer cells, principally by stimulating the infiltrating cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CD8+) in the tumor microenvironment 5-7. These therapies block the immunoinhibitory receptor PD-1, which is normally expressed on the surface of activated T cells, regulatory T cells, B cells and natural killer (NK) cells 3,6,7. However, in addition to low objective response rate for some tumors, notably for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and nivolumab 8,9 , there is a wide inter-individual variability of response to anti-PD-1 therapy, which complicates the task of reliably identifying responders and non-responders. Moreover, there are no robust markers to predict which patients are most likely to benefit from this therapy 10. Indeed, the determination