HDAC3 Inhibition Alleviates High-Glucose-Induced Retinal Ganglion Cell Death through Inhibiting Inflammasome Activation

Abstract

Purpose. The exact effects of histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) inhibition in DR related retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) death remained unclear. This study is aimed at detecting the influence of HDAC3 on the high-glucose-induced retinal ganglion cell death. Methods. The retinal HDAC3 expression in DR of different time points was analyzed by immunohistochemical assay and western blot. Besides, the expression of HDAC3 and both retinal thickness and RGC loss were analyzed. The effects of HDAC3 inhibitor on cell viability, oxidative stress, and apoptosis in high-glucose- (HG-) treated RGCs were analyzed. Both inflammatory and antioxidative factors were detected by ELISA. Results. Advanced effects of HDAC3 inhibition on the expression of NLRP3 inflammasome were detected using western blots. High HDAC3 expression was detected only in the late DR mice (4 months of diabetes duration) but not early DR mice (2 months of diabetes duration). The immunohistochemical assay showed that HDAC3 expression was correlated with both retinal thickness and RCG contents. HDAC3 inhibitor significantly protected the HG-treated RGCs from damaged cell viability, severe apoptosis, and oxidative stress. Advanced pathway analyses showed that HDAC3 inhibition inactivated NLRP3 inflammasome and thus alleviated retinal inflammation. Conclusion. In conclusion, HDAC3 was involved in RGC loss and thus promoted the progression of neurodegeneration of DR. Besides, HDAC3 inhibitor demonstrated protective effects in neurodegeneration in DR through downregulation of NLRP3 activity. The effects of HDAC3 inhibitor in DR management should be confirmed in clinical trials.

Retracted: HDAC3 Inhibition Alleviates High‐Glucose‐Induced Retinal Ganglion Cell Death through Inhibiting Inflammasome Activation

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”