2021
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2020.2998146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HDC-Net: Hierarchical Decoupled Convolution Network for Brain Tumor Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these methods were trained using the BraTS2018 training dataset and tested on the BraTS2018 validation dataset. The compared methods can be roughly categorized into 2D slicebased ones (17)(18)(19)(20) and 3D patch-based ones (22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Typically, 3D patch-based methods perform better than 2D slice-based Although a single 3D model such as HDC-Net can deliver promising results, most existing methods employ ensemble strategies to further improve the accuracy.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methods On the Brats2018 Validation Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All these methods were trained using the BraTS2018 training dataset and tested on the BraTS2018 validation dataset. The compared methods can be roughly categorized into 2D slicebased ones (17)(18)(19)(20) and 3D patch-based ones (22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Typically, 3D patch-based methods perform better than 2D slice-based Although a single 3D model such as HDC-Net can deliver promising results, most existing methods employ ensemble strategies to further improve the accuracy.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methods On the Brats2018 Validation Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-modal Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge has released a large amount of pre-operative multi-modal MR images and the corresponding manual annotations of brain tumor (3)(4)(5)(6). Benefited from this large dataset, convolutional neural network (CNN) has quickly dominated the fully-automated brain tumor segmentation field (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Task curriculum learning consists of tackling easy but related tasks first to provide auxiliary information for more complicated tasks, which will be solved later. Task curriculum learning is highly related to multi-stage learning in segmentation [2], [143], [144], where more easier tasks such as location or coarse segmentation are first solved with a simple method. After that, the more complex pixel-level segmentation is addressed.…”
Section: Curriculum Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical data augmentation methods not only include data warping methods [62] such as random affine and elastic transformations, random cropping [50], random erasing [63], [64], intensity transformation and adversarial data augmentation [65], [66], but also include methods that can synthesize more diverse and realistic labeled examples, such as mixing images [67]- [70], feature space augmentation [71], and generative adversarial networks [18], [72]- [74]. While general transformation augmentation methods such as random affine transformations, elastic transformations, and intensity transformations are easy to implement and have shown performance improvements in abundant applications [2], [34], [75], they do not take advantage of the knowledge in unlabeled training data. Recently, there is a growing interest in developing augmentation that can simulate real variations of the data, and thus task-driven approach [76]- [78] is a promising direction.…”
Section: B Data Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%