2022
DOI: 10.1002/mp.15658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HDR prostate brachytherapy plan robustness and its effect on in‐vivo source tracking error thresholds: A multi‐institutional study

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of departmental planning techniques on appropriate in-vivo source tracking error thresholds for high dose rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy (BT) treatments, and to determine if a single in-vivo source tracking error threshold would be appropriate for the same patient anatomy. Methods: The prostate, rectum, and urethra were contoured on a single patient transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) dataset. Anonymized DICOM files were disseminated to 16 departments who create… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 In prostate iBT various studies could not identify a universally valid threshold value, but determined error thresholds in the range of 1-6 mm that were not only strongly dependent on the individual patient's anatomy and implant geometry, [44][45][46][47] but also varied across treatment plans from different departments. 48 Kallis et al analyzed the follow-up CTs of 55 patients after two days of accelerated partial breast irradiation, that is after four out of nine treatment fractions, regarding both geometric deviations of dwell positions and their impact on dosimetric quality indices. They found mean geometric differences between corresponding dwell positions of 2.41 ± 1.73 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 In prostate iBT various studies could not identify a universally valid threshold value, but determined error thresholds in the range of 1-6 mm that were not only strongly dependent on the individual patient's anatomy and implant geometry, [44][45][46][47] but also varied across treatment plans from different departments. 48 Kallis et al analyzed the follow-up CTs of 55 patients after two days of accelerated partial breast irradiation, that is after four out of nine treatment fractions, regarding both geometric deviations of dwell positions and their impact on dosimetric quality indices. They found mean geometric differences between corresponding dwell positions of 2.41 ± 1.73 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is despite the fact that a joint review on clinical brachytherapy uncertainties by the GEC‐ESTRO and the AAPM reports that ‘the largest uncertainties are at the patient level and related to anatomical differences between the real patient situation at the time of dose delivery and the planned patient geometry and organ definitions. ' 22 In prostate iBT various studies could not identify a universally valid threshold value, but determined error thresholds in the range of 1–6 mm that were not only strongly dependent on the individual patient's anatomy and implant geometry, 44–47 but also varied across treatment plans from different departments 48 . Kallis et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A displacement of a heavily weighted dwell position can cause a large change in the dose to critical volumes [ 21 ]. When planning, evaluation of the treatment plan robustness may be considered using the metric developed by Poder et al ., where dwell location and relative weighting is taken into account [ 22 ]. Further investigation is required to verify the robustness parameter's application for gynecological application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is an effective treatment method for skin, vaginal, cervical, and prostate cancers, which together impact over 3 million individuals annually. [1][2][3][4][5][6] The efficacy of HDR brachytherapy is ascribed to its high dose rate and steep dose gradient, which delivers high dose to targets and spares surrounding organs at risk (OARs). A typical dose rate at treatment depth is about 0.5-1.0 Gy per minute for a new Ir-192 source with 370 GBq activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%