Language Ideological Debates 1999
DOI: 10.1515/9783110808049.171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

he debate on bilingual education in the U.S.: Language ideology as reflected in the practice of bilingual teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This region is characterized by Spanish maintenance and use in all areas of life. This contrasts with prevalent language use and attitudes in the rest of the country where the use and development of Spanish is seen as a threat to national identity (Huntington 2004;Shannon 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This region is characterized by Spanish maintenance and use in all areas of life. This contrasts with prevalent language use and attitudes in the rest of the country where the use and development of Spanish is seen as a threat to national identity (Huntington 2004;Shannon 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In the U.S. this ideology has been conflated with nationalism to the extent that maintaining a foreign tongue means being backward or even un-American (Wiley 2000). English is seen as a symbol of national identity, pride, unity, support and devotion typical of nationalistic ideology (Billig 1993in Shannon 1999. Clear illustrations of this conflation of ideologies are the success of Ron Unz' initiatives against bilingual education in California, Arizona and Massachusetts, and the legal case in Tennessee against a Mixtec mother who was ordered by a judge to learn English in six months or lose her parenting rights (Los Angeles Times, February 14, 2005).…”
Section: Dominant Language Ideologies In the Usmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example of this more liberal ideology is the bilingual education movement. However, despite its explicit orientation towards multilingualism in society, the bilingual education movement has effectively supported and maintained the ideology of monolingualism, as it has essentially been a means towards the achievement of English monolingualism (Shannon, 1999). That is, bilingual education programmes have largely been designed to provide linguistic minority students with support until they have suf cient command of English to leave their home and community languages behind.…”
Section: Monolingual Ideologies In Multilingual Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%