“…Such characteristics include presence of only six Malpighian tubules (more than six in all other Neuroptera), female genitalic morphology, sperm microstructure and ovariole structure (Sziráki, , ; Kubrakiewicz et al ., ; Zizzari et al ., ). The extreme modifications of coniopterygids have also led some authors to suggest instead that they are more derived, and quantitative studies utilizing only small amounts of DNA sequence data, or morphology alone, have recovered the family in a variety of derived positions, sister to families such as Sisyridae (Aspöck et al ., ; Winterton, ), Dilaridae (Haring & Aspöck, ), or the ‘dilarid’ clade (Zimmermann et al ., , ; Beutel et al ., ; Randolf et al ., , , ). Moreover, most of these authors have thus suggested other families are sister to the rest of the order based on either qualitative or quantitative studies, including, Ithonidae s.s. (Withycombe, : although he presciently placed coniopterygids as the next basal group and contrary to the more derived placement of subsequent authors), Nevrorthidae (Aspöck et al ., ; Aspöck & Aspöck, ; Beutel et al ., ,b) and Sisyridae (Randolf et al ., , ; Zimmermann et al ., ), among others.…”