2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head and neck free flap survival when requiring interposition vein grafting: A multi-instiutional review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advances in tissue engineering have demonstrated that the successful regeneration of soft tissues helps to prevent exogenous infection, provide sufficient nutrients, and establish blood supply, as well as providing other benefits [5]. Moreover, a large number of clinical studies have identified that natural free flaps can be used to effectively achieve soft tissue regeneration, significantly improving the outcomes of craniofacial reconstruction [6]. It is well known that the vascular system is required for embryonic development and tissue regeneration, and adequate blood vessel formation enables supply of sufficient oxygen and nutrients and elimination of metabolic waste [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in tissue engineering have demonstrated that the successful regeneration of soft tissues helps to prevent exogenous infection, provide sufficient nutrients, and establish blood supply, as well as providing other benefits [5]. Moreover, a large number of clinical studies have identified that natural free flaps can be used to effectively achieve soft tissue regeneration, significantly improving the outcomes of craniofacial reconstruction [6]. It is well known that the vascular system is required for embryonic development and tissue regeneration, and adequate blood vessel formation enables supply of sufficient oxygen and nutrients and elimination of metabolic waste [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have demonstrated comparable failure rates in head and neck reconstruction (15%). 13 In two pooled analyses of >2,000 and >3,000 head and neck free flap patients, vein grafts were associated with a 5-5.5 fold increased risk of flap failure. 14,15 Possible explanations for this include venous graft size mismatch affecting flow rate, issues with pedicle geometry, or poor quality target vessels in vessel depleted necks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Typical recipient vessels may not be viable options in salvage cases, patients with recent infection, or in a vessel-depleted neck, in which use of the transverse cervical artery is often required. The dorsal scapular artery has also been described as a viable recipient vessel during free flap reconstruction in a vessel-depleted neck [64] . Interposition vein grafts may be required to lengthen the venous and/or arterial pedicle despite appropriate pre-operative planning and intra-operative efforts with overall success rates around 85% [65] .…”
Section: Recipient Vesselsmentioning
confidence: 99%