2020
DOI: 10.1177/1087054720911988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head Motion During MRI Predicted by out-of-Scanner Sustained Attention Performance in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Abstract: Objective: To characterize head movements in children with ADHD using an ex-Gaussian distribution and examine associations with out-of-scanner sustained attention. Method: Fifty-six children with ADHD and 61 controls aged 9 to 11 years completed the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In-scanner head motion was calculated using ex-Gaussian estimates for mu, sigma, and tau in delta variation signal and framewise displacement. Sustained atte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of measurement error in brain morphology may differ across children with versus without ADHD. In fact, children with impulsivity and inattention have been shown to move more during MRI scanning ( Thomson et al, 2021 ; Kong et al, 2014 ), determining different levels of error in the brain morphology assessments ( Figure 7 , path from ADHD symptoms to motion to error in MRI measurement). In this scenario, adjusting for motion might lead to two situations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of measurement error in brain morphology may differ across children with versus without ADHD. In fact, children with impulsivity and inattention have been shown to move more during MRI scanning ( Thomson et al, 2021 ; Kong et al, 2014 ), determining different levels of error in the brain morphology assessments ( Figure 7 , path from ADHD symptoms to motion to error in MRI measurement). In this scenario, adjusting for motion might lead to two situations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reproducible identification of RSFC subtypes across individuals who meet typical inclusion criteria and those often excluded from neurodevelopmental research due to noisy data could have significant implications for improving retention and representation in these studies. Historically, individuals who exhibit high motion during scans, often those with pronounced behavioral problems or cognitive impairments (Thomson et al, 2021), are excluded from neurodevelopmental research. This exclusion has limited our understanding of brain-behavior relationships in those who might benefit most from such insights (Satterthwaite et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With head motion linked to age and ADHD diagnosis, inclusion as a covariate likely results in an underestimation of effects of interest (Dosenbach et al, 2017 ; Kong et al, 2014 ; Thomson et al, 2021 ). However, given the potential for motion in our sample and to ensure confidence in findings, models were rerun in two motion-matched subsamples following the matching approach of Satterthwaite et al ( 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%