1993
DOI: 10.9746/sicetr1965.29.71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head Positioning Control of a Hard Disk Drive Using H^|^infin; Control Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the sampling period of r = 5O[ps] is small enough for the hard disk drive used in this study and it has been used for the digital implementation of analog controllers [6]. …”
Section: Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the sampling period of r = 5O[ps] is small enough for the hard disk drive used in this study and it has been used for the digital implementation of analog controllers [6]. …”
Section: Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods were extended by Maciejowski [13] into discrete time LQG/LTR, which was applied later to design a tracking controller for compound (dual stage) disk drive actuator system by Yen et al [22] and Weerasooriya and Phan [20]. Based upon the frequency domain specifications on bandwidth and stability margins, Hirata et al [9] applied the method of modern H ∞ control to synthesize a head positioning servo system in HDD. Since the system has two poles at the origin, the mixed sensitivity minimization problem in H ∞ controller synthesis cannot be solved directly and has to be dealt with a priori by adjusting the design specifications in order to satisfy the numerical assumptions in the design [2,4,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based upon the frequency domain specifications on bandwidth and stability margins, Hirata et al [9] applied the method of modern H ∞ control to synthesize a head positioning servo system in HDD. Since the system has two poles at the origin, the mixed sensitivity minimization problem in H ∞ controller synthesis cannot be solved directly and has to be dealt with a priori by adjusting the design specifications in order to satisfy the numerical assumptions in the design [2,4,9]. This paper presents the design and real-time implementation of a robust track following HDD servo control system using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) toolbox [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust control techniques such as H ∞ control are effective when the plants have uncertainty. In H ∞ control, robust stabilization can be achieved with respect to additive and multiplicative perturbations [1]. The gain of the complementary sensitivity function must be reduced in the frequency range where modeling errors exist, which is similar to the gain stabilization approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, handling of the lowest-order resonance modes (primary resonance modes) is important to achieve high-bandwidth design. Therefore, control performance depends strongly on how such modes are stabilized [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%