2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head Posture and Neck Pain of Chronic Nontraumatic Origin: A Comparison Between Patients and Pain-Free Persons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
126
2
16

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
126
2
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the hypothesis that the craniocervical postural changes may influence in the highest frequency of the signs and symptoms of CCD in subjects with TMD was rejected. Additionally, considering the direct biomechanical relation of the muscles and cervical spine in the maintenance of head balance, it seems that the postural changes are more related to the occurrence of CCD, as previously demonstrated by other studies (11,23) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Therefore, the hypothesis that the craniocervical postural changes may influence in the highest frequency of the signs and symptoms of CCD in subjects with TMD was rejected. Additionally, considering the direct biomechanical relation of the muscles and cervical spine in the maintenance of head balance, it seems that the postural changes are more related to the occurrence of CCD, as previously demonstrated by other studies (11,23) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Younger patients with chronic nontraumatic neck pain, and without age-related spondylotic changes, were shown to have a more forward head posture in standing than matched pain-free participants in one study [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its decreasing values are indicative of a more forward head posture 13 . From this angle were considered other variables: 1) Forward Head Posture at Early Chewing (FHPEC) measured by the angle value at …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shooting occurred in the randomized side in DT group and the most affected side in CP group. For kinematic evaluation black spherical markers made on a white circular base were stuck with double-sided tape: glabella (midline of the face and 1 cm above the nose), canthus of the eye, tragus (cartilage above the ear), the tip of the chin, spinous process of C7 13 . To calculate the real coordinates, a system of two-dimensional calibration 1.0 x 1.0 was placed in the plane of the filming.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%