2013
DOI: 10.1121/1.4828983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head-related transfer function interpolation in azimuth, elevation, and distance

Abstract: Although distance-dependent head-related transfer function (HRTF) databases provide interesting possibilities, e.g., for rendering virtual sounds in the near-field, there is a lack of algorithms and tools to make use of them. Here, a framework is proposed for interpolating HRTF measurements in 3-D (i.e., azimuth, elevation, and distance) using tetrahedral interpolation with barycentric weights. For interpolation, a tetrahedral mesh is generated via Delaunay triangulation and searched via an adjacency walk, mak… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result from using tetrahedral interpolation with minimum phase HRIRs as input data, and SD HRTF minimum phase of 2.7959 dB, is comparable with that of tetrahedral interpolation with magnitude HRTFs as input data (Gamper, 2013a) and SD HRTF interpolation of 2.7852 dB. The framework proposed here is to interpolate measured HRTFs in 3D, namely azimuth, elevation, and distance, using tetrahedral interpolation with minimum phase HRIRs as its input and barycentric weights.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our result from using tetrahedral interpolation with minimum phase HRIRs as input data, and SD HRTF minimum phase of 2.7959 dB, is comparable with that of tetrahedral interpolation with magnitude HRTFs as input data (Gamper, 2013a) and SD HRTF interpolation of 2.7852 dB. The framework proposed here is to interpolate measured HRTFs in 3D, namely azimuth, elevation, and distance, using tetrahedral interpolation with minimum phase HRIRs as its input and barycentric weights.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Figure 4 Graphical interpretation of tetrahedral interpolation (Gamper, 2013a) The weights g i are the barycentric coordinates of point X. To estimate the target HRTF x Ĥ at point X as the weighted sum of the HRTFs, H i , measured at A, B, C, and D, we can use the barycentric coordinates as interpolation weights, as follows:…”
Section: Tetrahedral Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parametric approaches allow to describe HRTFs with a limited set of parameters instead of the whole set of filter coefficients, reducing the amount of information needed to describe a complete HRTF dataset. Moreover, parametric methods result in additional benefits such as the simplification of the interpolation procedures needed for synthesizing HRTFs corresponding to spatial angles missing in the original HRTF dataset [10], [11]. While the previous work in [7] was shown to provide all the above benefits by implementing a chain of second-order sections (SOS), the data dependencies within the proposed sequential structure prevent taking advantage of current parallel processors embedded into state-of-the-art devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It permits to compare the signals received at the ears to a reference signal (the source signal) and provides information such as elevation and distance between the source and the ears [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%