Background. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent disease with major negative implications both for the patient and the health system. Patients showing a higher rate of respiratory events while sleeping in the supine position suffers from the so called positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA), which is one of the most frequent OSA phenotypes (56%-75%).There is not a consensus within the medical community concerning POSA diagnosis. Since the first definition of positional patients by Cartwright as those showing an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in the supine position at least twice the AHI in the non-supine position, numerous amendments have been performed.Recently, the Amsterdam Positional OSA Classification (APOC) criterion has been proposed, which attempts to identify those patients who could benefit the most from a positional therapy due to the removal of positional-related apneas leads to a nonpathologic condition despite residual events or, alternatively, because the absence of positional apneas leads to a significant reduction of the severity of the disease. Are there differences in the severity degree of POSA and Non-POSA patients? Published works are contradictory. Some researchers consider POSA as a milder phenotype of the disease. On the contrary, other authors link supinedependent apneas to more frequent, longer, and severe events, with deeper desaturations, and with a more severe bradycardia-tachycardia pattern. Thus, further research is needed to gain insight into the actual effects of positional apneas.
Hypotheses and objectives.The main hypothesis in the present PhD Thesis is that the variability linked to the different existing POSA definitions could affect the viii prevalence, clinical characteristics, and management of patients, and thus, to their health and quality of life. Particularly, as a secondary question, it is hypothesized that positional patients could have higher cardiac autonomic disbalance than nonpositional subjects. Accordingly, the main aim of the PhD Thesis is to characterize patients diagnosed as POSA according to the new APOC criteria and thoroughly analyze their differences compared to a group of non-positional subjects. The following secondary objectives are also stated: to estimate the POSA prevalence according to the existing positional criteria; to analyze the differences among the POSA categories defined by the APOC criterion; to analyze the polysomnographic and pulseoximetric indexes of POSA and Non-POSA patients; to study the influence of POSA in sleep quality, quality of life, and CPAP treatment adherence; to analyze its effect on cardiac autonomic modulation. Materials and methods. A total of 409 patients consecutively referred to the sleep unit of the Pneumology Service of the Río Hortega University Hospital of Valladolid between July 2016 and April 2018 were included in the research. All patients underwent unsupervised nocturnal polysomnography (PSG) at home and simultaneous nocturnal pulse oximetry recording by means of a portable pulseoximeter. A triax...