2014
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.03552-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head-to-Head Comparison of Second-Generation Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae on Urine Samples from Female Subjects and Self-Collected Vaginal Swabs

Abstract: f In a comparison of 4 second-generation nucleic acid amplification tests performed with self-collected vaginal swab (SCVS) and first-void urine (FVU) specimens from 575 women, SCVS specimens indicated more infections than did FVU specimens in all assays. The prevalence rates were 9% (53/575 patients) for Chlamydia trachomatis and 2% (11/575 patients) for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The clinical sensitivities for testing SCVS specimens for C. trachomatis were 98.1% on a Tigris system and 96.2% on a Panther system f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, urine specimens were used for chlamydia nucleic acid amplification testing in female participants. During the course of the study, vaginal swabs become the preferred specimen for chlamydia screening by means of nucleic acid amplification testing, 30 in part because of the slightly higher sensitivity of this type of testing when vaginal swab samples are used 31 ; however, we continued to test urine specimens for comparison purposes, and it is possible that a small number of infections were undetected. Third, an unexpected challenge in our study was the high rate of early discharge from youth correctional facilities; this may have been due in part to changing trends in juvenile justice policies leading to fewer and shorter incarcerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, urine specimens were used for chlamydia nucleic acid amplification testing in female participants. During the course of the study, vaginal swabs become the preferred specimen for chlamydia screening by means of nucleic acid amplification testing, 30 in part because of the slightly higher sensitivity of this type of testing when vaginal swab samples are used 31 ; however, we continued to test urine specimens for comparison purposes, and it is possible that a small number of infections were undetected. Third, an unexpected challenge in our study was the high rate of early discharge from youth correctional facilities; this may have been due in part to changing trends in juvenile justice policies leading to fewer and shorter incarcerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are the recommended diagnostic test for diagnosis and repeat testing given their superior sensitivity and specificity when compared to culture for the detection of urogenital chlamydial infections. 2,6,7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With clearance by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other regulatory agencies in Europe and elsewhere of several systems, automated molecular testing has become routine in clinical laboratory practice, ensuring diagnostic accuracy and improved result turnaround time (TAT). Studies have been published assessing clinical performances of molecular assays (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8), and workflow and maintenance characteristics of automated instruments (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). In addition to performance and instrumentreagent costs, hands-on time required for testing and maintenance, in-process interaction, and time to results and test capacity are key metrics that should be considered because they can influence efficiency and labor costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, the respective second-generation assays for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae were used to process 96 and 192 tests on each instrument. A related study (8) compared the diagnostic performance of these assays for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae on self-collected vaginal swabs and first-void urine samples on the respective automated instruments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%