Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006213.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The factors known to increase infection rates are surgically created dead space, proximity to the anal area, and the reproduction of anaerobic bacteria in the airless environment. The high infection rate in the present study (13%) is less commonly observed in methods that leave no dead space or that create minimal dead space [19,25]. Some trials indicate that wound healing is slower in smokers and obese patients [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The factors known to increase infection rates are surgically created dead space, proximity to the anal area, and the reproduction of anaerobic bacteria in the airless environment. The high infection rate in the present study (13%) is less commonly observed in methods that leave no dead space or that create minimal dead space [19,25]. Some trials indicate that wound healing is slower in smokers and obese patients [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…Fewer infections, recurrences, and other complications occurred and wound healing was quicker after off-midline closure than after midline closure. Recurrence rates were significantly lower (1.4%) than with midline closure (10.3%) [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another patient was operated on by sinus excision and primary closure and operated on again because of a relapse of the pilonidal disease. In total, 4 patients had relapses in the excision and primary closure group compared with 1 patient in the laying open group (P ϭ .198).The scar size measured at follow-up 1 year after surgery did not differ between the sinus excision and primary closure (6.2(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)) and the laying open (5.4 (1.5-12); P ϭ .179) group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…7,12 The importance of excising all diseased tissue and suturing away from the midline has been stressed. [15][16][17] However, all excisional procedures carry the risk of creating tissue loss and initiating chronic healing problems necessitating the need for repeated surgery and tissue transfer. One way to overcome this problem is to use less invasive procedures such as sclerosing the sinus 18 -21 or laying open.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%