The meaning of trauma within psychology has for a long time been viewed mostly from a 'pathologising' standpoint. Viewed as pathology, people's trauma may become understood using a singular lens thereby leaving out broader contextual (social, environmental, political, historical, economical etc.) aspects that have been shown to play a role in the subjective experience of various forms of suffering. Psychology has for a long time been quick to diagnose victims of traumatic experiences from an individualistic perspective, almost always positioning the 'problem' within the person. As a result of the Vietnam War, World Wars I and II and the Holocaust, the rise in the diagnosing of PTSD gave way to the labelling of trauma. Within psychology, post-traumatic stress disorder has become the way to operationalise suffering, and I would like to argue that this occludes how suffering lives in a family, a community and in gendered bodies. The gendering of trauma continues to be a silenced space. There is a need to highlight and acknowledge the gendered nature of suffering which begs for trauma to be understood in context and not as an isolated act or occurrence affecting the individual. Women have remained, and in many ways continue to remain, silenced with minimal opportunities to name the world for themselves. This paper seeks to provide a critical analysis of the notion of trauma (and its intersection with gender) that arises from conf lict and post-conf lict situations.
Problematising the Notion of TraumaThe concept of trauma is complex and therefore cannot be comprehended in a simplistic manner. It encompasses many aspects that require an understanding of its nature and the context in which it occurs (Richters, 2006). As a result, there is tension that characterises the various fields of trauma studies. Such tension arises from various disciplines pointing to how trauma manifests at a psychosocial, individual and community level, and these multiple levels ref lect its complexity by highlighting how it may be perceived as a socio-political event, a psycho-physiological process, a physical and emotional experience and a narrative (Sonpar, 2008). Wessells (2008) posits that the term 'trauma' is not only complex but problematic because it tends to reduce complex problems to psychological terms. He further argues that trauma puts a clinical cast on problems that are political, economic and socio-historical and that in many contexts, trauma has been a neo-colonial imposition that tends to silence or marginalise local understandings and practices related to mental health and psychosocial well-being. This is also reiterated in Ingrid Palmary's (2005) article entitled Engendering war and conf lict: women and war trauma, where she asserts that debates about trauma and its management have largely taken place within psychiatry and psychology, which have both received criticism due to the limited way in which they define and give meaning to trauma, as articulated in the diagnostic and statistical manual DSM wherein trauma is classif...