2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10728-014-0279-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health 2.0: Relational Resources for the Development of Quality in Healthcare

Abstract: Traditional approaches in healthcare have been challenged giving way to broader forms of users' participation in treatment. In this article we present the Health 2.0 movement as an example of relational and participatory practices in healthcare. Health 2.0 is an approach in which participation is the major aim, aspiring to reshape the system into more collaborative and less hierarchical relationships. We offer two illustrations in order to discuss how Health 2.0 is related and can contribute to a positive upta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A team of dedicated professionals will take the responsibility of implementing this plan, which is an actual fact a component of the quality improvement process. Collaborative efforts are required in order to achieve this goal [3]. Some special aspects of healthcare quality are applicable as pivotal moving factors in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC).…”
Section: General Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A team of dedicated professionals will take the responsibility of implementing this plan, which is an actual fact a component of the quality improvement process. Collaborative efforts are required in order to achieve this goal [3]. Some special aspects of healthcare quality are applicable as pivotal moving factors in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC).…”
Section: General Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, a process approach to empowerment has seen relatively little interest from researchers. Finally, most of the studies have chosen an individual, patient-centered approach [ 29 ] at the expense of a deeper understanding of their collective being [ 30 , 31 ], thus setting aside the voluntary process of affiliating with a peer group and tapping into collective intelligence. Given these analyses and considering the new status of citizen-patient as well as the power of connecting with a peer community, it is thus necessary to add depth to the study of empowerment, taking a bottom-up approach that is collective and process-driven.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%