Health and medical coverage in the UK national press

Abstract

The growth of UK public interest in health in the last decade is reflected by the inclusion in most national newspapers of regular health or medical sections. These potentially allow subjects to be covered in detail, with more background information and useful advice. This paper reports on a content analysis study of eight national newspapers, which aimed to obtain an overview of press health coverage, to compare the coverage of popular and quality papers, and to analyse differences in health topic coverage between 1981 and 1990. The subject coverage, information provision and presentation of health related articles were considered. The most common subject categories were diseases, preventive medicine (including diet and exercise) and the National Health Service. Class inequalities in health received very little coverage. Clear differences were confirmed between quality broadsheet and popular tabloid newspapers. Quality papers provided more scientific information about health and paid more attention to political contexts. They made more use of authoritative journals and reports than popular papers, which focused on individual case histories and tended to quote a lay viewpoint. Popular press articles were generally more sensationalized and less objective in their reporting style. Newspapers do not exist solely to further public understanding, but have potential to contribute to it. Some informative, useful articles about health are found, but the study shows room for improvement, especially among the papers whose readership is concentrated in lower socio-economic groups.

The worries of weaning: Newspaper reporting of infant weaning and its impact on dialogue in online discussion forums

“…Davidson and Wallack (2004, p.116) conclude that health reporting in the news is "...often superficial, confusing, or inaccurate", while previous research has highlighted a wide difference in reporting by the various genres of newspapers (Entwistle and Hancock-Beaulieu, 1992). The results from this study suggest articles on weaning in the tabloid and middle-market papers lacked a level of scientific detail and balance when compared to the quality newspapers.…”

“…Previous research has found that newspapers differ dramatically in their selection of topics and their narrative styles (Entwistle and Hancock-Beaulieu, 1992;Hilton et al, 2010 The use of personal testimonies was also favoured in newspapers such as the Daily Mail, suggesting the power and persuasiveness of including personal stories in the light of the public's mistrust of authority (Hilton et al, 2010).…”

Peddling a semiotics of fear: a critical examination of scare tactics and commercial strategies in public health promotion

“…This portrayal obscures the reality of diabetes as a disease which, although can indeed have very serious long-term biological consequences, people are able to manage successfully (Ellison and Rayman 1998), living full and long lives (Lutgers et al 2009). Thus the campaign mirrors the somewhat sensationalist way in which some quarters of the media report illnesses -with a strong focus on the debilitating and fatal aspects of disease at the expense of reporting how people actually live with and overcome the effects of illnesses (Entwistle and Hancock-Beaulieu 1992;Seale 2002: 45-47). One objection to our critical multimodal analysis is that if the campaign raises people's awareness of diabetes and prompts those at very real risk of the disease to act accordingly, then surely it is justified in harnessing a rhetoric of fear -the end, in other words, justifies the means.…”

Journalism and Expertise

“…In an expanding media universe, with escalating coverage of health and science issues (Clayton et al, 1993;Entwistle and Beaulieu-Hancock, 1992;Miller et al, 1998, pp. 147 Á8;Nelkin 1987), questions of who to trust to provide expert information and opinion is a vital issue for journalists and academics.…”