2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00013-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health care provider's attitudes and beliefs towards chronic low back pain: the development of a questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
221
2
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
221
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous factor analysis of the scale indicated two discrete factors: biomedical (items 1 to 10) and biopsychosocial (items 11 to 19) 31 . The items for both factors are scored on a 6-point Likert scale (0="totally disagree" to 5 = "totally agree").…”
Section: Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale For Physiotherapists (Pabspt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous factor analysis of the scale indicated two discrete factors: biomedical (items 1 to 10) and biopsychosocial (items 11 to 19) 31 . The items for both factors are scored on a 6-point Likert scale (0="totally disagree" to 5 = "totally agree").…”
Section: Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale For Physiotherapists (Pabspt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 It is a self-administered questionnaire aimed at measuring the strength of physiotherapists' treatment orientations in chronic LBP on two sub-scales: Biomedical Orientation (BM) and Behavioural Orientation (BH). Biomedical orientation refers to applying the biomedical model of disease, whereby pain and disability are believed to result from a specific structural impairment and treatment addresses that impairment.…”
Section: Standardized Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In addition, scores on each of the PABS-PT sub-scales have been shown to be higher for those physiotherapists whose education and professional profile are more specific to the orientation (e.g., those with a bio-psychosocial background scored higher on the Behavioural Orientation sub-scale). 7 The Attitudes to Back Pain Scale for musculoskeletal practitioners (ABS-mp), developed by Pincus and colleagues, 11 assesses the effect of practitioners' attitudes on clinical practice, training needs, and outcome. It was developed with a UK sample of musculoskeletal physiotherapists, chiropractors, and osteopaths.…”
Section: Standardized Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT): The aim to test attitudes and beliefs of the DPTs was to find if the DPTs followed a biomedical or a biopsychosocial orientation. Ostelo et al (2003) [11] developed the PABS-PT to assess the strength of two possible healthcare professionals (HCP) orientations towards the management of patients with chronic LBP among PTs in Netherlands. The 'biomedical' orientation was described as one in which the HCP believed in a biomechanical model of disease, where disability and pain are a consequence of a specific pathology within the spinal tissues and treatment is aimed at treating the pathology and alleviating pain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different versions that have been developed, attempted to improve the structure of the original behavioral subscale, although internal consistency (Cronbach's 0.52 to 0.68) has consistently fallen short of recommended levels [12]. Though there was evidence for content and construct validity [11,13] although there is no 'gold standard' with which to compare scores on the PABS. Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS-12): IUS-12 was used in this survey to measure DPT's IU, which represents their worry and anxiety.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%