2022
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.4090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) treated with systemic therapy in the United States (US).

Abstract: 4090 Background: BTC is associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment choices. There is limited evidence on HCRU and costs among BTC patients receiving systemic treatments (ST). This study examined HCRU and total direct cost of care among BTC patients treated with ST to understand the disease burden in management of BTC. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of BTC patients who received first line (1L) ST was conducted, using US private payer Cancer Care Quality Program data and administrative claims f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research is needed to determine whether PFS on first line (delaying the need to move to a second or third line of therapy) may have cost benefits (in addition to the clinical benefit). Our study adds more recent data to prior literature evaluating healthcare costs associated with BTCs [ 15 , 20 22 ]. Costs related to BTCs comprised most of the costs in a commercial and Medicare claims analysis conducted by Chamberlain et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Further research is needed to determine whether PFS on first line (delaying the need to move to a second or third line of therapy) may have cost benefits (in addition to the clinical benefit). Our study adds more recent data to prior literature evaluating healthcare costs associated with BTCs [ 15 , 20 22 ]. Costs related to BTCs comprised most of the costs in a commercial and Medicare claims analysis conducted by Chamberlain et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%