Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
This paper examines the relationship between ethnicity and immigrant generation in relationship to early educational outcomes and their potential determinants. Using Born in Bradford, a large longitudinal birth cohort, and its linked education and health records, we investigated the associations between ethnicity, immigration generations and education measures (Early Years Foundation Stage Profile and National Curriculum Key Stage One). We looked at the children of both first- and second-generation immigrants and compared them with White British non-immigrant children. Logistic regressions were used to examine the explanatory factors of the differences. On the Early Years Foundation Stage Profile, children of first-generation Pakistani immigrants did less well than White British non-immigrant children. This was largely related to language barriers. There were no significant differences between the children of second-generation Pakistani families and children of White British non-immigrant families. In Key Stage One results, there were no differences in reading and maths between children of first-generation Pakistani immigrants and the White British children, however, children of first-generation Pakistani immigrants had better scores in Key Stage One writing. Children of second-generation Pakistani immigrants had better odds of achieving expected standards in most models for reading and writing (but not maths) than the White British children. This might be attributed to better socioeconomic circumstances. Immigrant generation is an independent predictor for early educational outcomes. There are different patterns associated with different immigrant generations. Early life policy interventions to help children of first-generation immigrant with their English language before school could improve these children’s school readiness.
This paper examines the relationship between ethnicity and immigrant generation in relationship to early educational outcomes and their potential determinants. Using Born in Bradford, a large longitudinal birth cohort, and its linked education and health records, we investigated the associations between ethnicity, immigration generations and education measures (Early Years Foundation Stage Profile and National Curriculum Key Stage One). We looked at the children of both first- and second-generation immigrants and compared them with White British non-immigrant children. Logistic regressions were used to examine the explanatory factors of the differences. On the Early Years Foundation Stage Profile, children of first-generation Pakistani immigrants did less well than White British non-immigrant children. This was largely related to language barriers. There were no significant differences between the children of second-generation Pakistani families and children of White British non-immigrant families. In Key Stage One results, there were no differences in reading and maths between children of first-generation Pakistani immigrants and the White British children, however, children of first-generation Pakistani immigrants had better scores in Key Stage One writing. Children of second-generation Pakistani immigrants had better odds of achieving expected standards in most models for reading and writing (but not maths) than the White British children. This might be attributed to better socioeconomic circumstances. Immigrant generation is an independent predictor for early educational outcomes. There are different patterns associated with different immigrant generations. Early life policy interventions to help children of first-generation immigrant with their English language before school could improve these children’s school readiness.
Background Research undertaken using the Born in Bradford cohort study identified consanguinity as a major risk factor for congenital anomalies and also reported longer term adverse health outcomes associated with consanguinity. Methods We report the prevalence of consanguinity from two cohort studies in the same geographical area with a nine year gap: Born in Bradford (BiB) and Born in Bradford’s Better Start (BiBBS). We examine and compare rates of consanguinity and the characteristics of the consanguineous in each study population to examine if and how these have changed in the years between the recruitment periods of 2007–2010 (BiB) and 2016–2019 (BiBBS). Results There had been a substantial decrease in consanguineous unions in women of Pakistani heritage, the proportion of women who were first cousins with the father of their baby fell from 39.3% to 27.0%, and those who were other blood relations fell from 23.1% to 19.3%. Only 37.6% of Pakistani heritage women were unrelated to the father of their baby in BiB, but 53.7% were unrelated in BiBBS. All but one White British respondent was unrelated to their baby’s father in both cohorts, and around 90% of the ‘Other ethnicities’ group (i.e., not White British or Pakistani heritage) were unrelated to the baby’s father in both cohorts. The reduction was most marked in women of Pakistani heritage who were born in the UK, in those educated to A level or higher and in women under age 25. Conclusions An appreciation of changing rates of consanguinity and linked health needs will be valuable to those who commission and provide antenatal, paediatric and genetic services in Bradford and in other areas where consanguinity is likely to be a major risk factor. Falling rates in this city may reflect wider changes in partner choices in similar populations.
Background Research undertaken using the Born in Bradford cohort study identified consanguinity as a major risk factor for congenital anomalies and also reported longer term adverse health outcomes associated with consanguinity. Methods We report the prevalence of consanguinity from two cohort studies in the same geographical area with a nine year gap: Born in Bradford (BiB) and Born in Bradford’s Better Start (BiBBS). We examine and compare rates of consanguinity and the characteristics of the consanguineous in each study population to examine if and how these have changed in the years between the recruitment periods of 2007–2010 (BiB) and 2016–2019 (BiBBS). Results There had been a substantial decrease in consanguineous unions in women of Pakistani heritage, the proportion of women who were first cousins with the father of their baby fell from 39.3% to 27.0%, and those who were other blood relations fell from 23.1% to 19.3%. Only 37.6% of Pakistani heritage women were unrelated to the father of their baby in BiB, but 53.7% were unrelated in BiBBS. All but one White British respondent was unrelated to their baby’s father in both cohorts, and around 90% of the ‘Other ethnicities’ group (i.e., not White British or Pakistani heritage) were unrelated to the baby’s father in both cohorts. The reduction was most marked in women of Pakistani heritage who were born in the UK, in those educated to A level or higher and in women under age 25. Conclusions An appreciation of changing rates of consanguinity and linked health needs will be valuable to those who commission and provide antenatal, paediatric and genetic services in Bradford and in other areas where consanguinity is likely to be a major risk factor. Falling rates in this city may reflect wider changes in partner choices in similar populations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.