A Companion to American Indian History 2002
DOI: 10.1002/9780470996461.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health, Disease, and Demography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Estimates of Indigenous population decline in the face of smallpox, measles, bubonic plague, cholera, typhoid, diphtheria, scarlet fever, and malaria has ranged from as low as 2 million to as high as 7 million. 10 The wide range in hypothesized death rates reflects debates over the total pre-1492 population. High estimators posit a relatively large initial Indigenous population ranging between 12.5 and 18 million, and argue that European-introduced diseases had a significant and early impact.…”
Section: Resilience: An Alternative Approach To Epidemic Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Estimates of Indigenous population decline in the face of smallpox, measles, bubonic plague, cholera, typhoid, diphtheria, scarlet fever, and malaria has ranged from as low as 2 million to as high as 7 million. 10 The wide range in hypothesized death rates reflects debates over the total pre-1492 population. High estimators posit a relatively large initial Indigenous population ranging between 12.5 and 18 million, and argue that European-introduced diseases had a significant and early impact.…”
Section: Resilience: An Alternative Approach To Epidemic Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31] Assessing the imposition of domesticated agriculture by Europeans during early contact, Cherokee-American anthropologist and historian Russell Thornton has thus suggested that "the reasons for the relatively few infectious diseases in this [western] hemisphere [prior to European contact] surely include… the existence of fewer domesticated animals, from which many human diseases arise" -unlike those that later grew up due to grain storage and transit patterns which differed from hunter-gatherer lifestyles as well as their own pre-contact forms of landmanagement and crop cultivation. [32] As biological anthropologists have shown, some precontact Native American communities were likely familiar with the association between cultivated animal lots and disease, albeit in more isolated settings. Pueblo Native Americans had witnessed the spread of diseases in areas contaminated by turkey dung, most probably salmonella and Shigella.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter exacerbated the spread of diseases that Native American communities were already struggling to fight off due to their impaired immunity. [24] According to the pioneering paleo-archeological work of Armelagos, such a phenomenon has commonly affected societies as they have transitioned to concentrated agricultural settlement and animal husbandry. Examining paleo-archeological evidence in European and Middle Eastern populations, Armelagos has noted the problems that followed relatively sudden proximity to domesticated animals and to human and animal waste in newly agricultural societies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%