Health economic evaluation of a nurse-led care model from the nursing home perspective focusing on residents’ hospitalisations

Abstract

Background Health economic evaluations of the implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) into practice provide vital information but are rarely conducted. We evaluated the health economic impact associated with implementation and intervention of the INTERCARE model—an EBI to reduce hospitalisations of nursing home (NH) residents—compared to usual NH care. Methods The INTERCARE model was conducted in 11 NHs in Switzerland. It was implemented as a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation study with a multi-centre non-randomised stepped-wedge design. To isolate the implementation strategies' costs, time and other resources from the NHs’ perspective, we applied time-driven activity-based costing. To define its intervention costs, time and other resources, we considered intervention-relevant expenditures, particularly the work of the INTERCARE nurse—a core INTERCARE element. Further, the costs and revenues from the hotel and nursing services were analysed to calculate the NHs' losses and savings per resident hospitalisation. Finally, alongside our cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), a sensitivity analysis focused on the intervention's effectiveness—i.e., regarding reduction of the hospitalisation rate—relative to the INTERCARE costs. All economic variables and CEA were assessed from the NHs' perspective. Results Implementation strategy costs and time consumption per bed averaged 685CHF and 9.35 h respectively, with possibilities to adjust material and human resources to each NH’s needs. Average yearly intervention costs for the INTERCARE nurse salary per bed were 939CHF with an average of 1.4 INTERCARE nurses per 100 beds and an average employment rate of 76% of full-time equivalent per nurse. Resident hospitalisation represented a total average loss of 52% of NH revenues, but negligible cost savings. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the INTERCARE model compared to usual care was 22′595CHF per avoided hospitalisation. As expected, the most influential sensitivity analysis variable regarding the CEA was the pre- to post-INTERCARE change in hospitalisation rate. Conclusions As initial health-economic evidence, these results indicate that the INTERCARE model was more costly but also more effective compared to usual care in participating Swiss German NHs. Further implementation and evaluation of this model in randomised controlled studies are planned to build stronger evidential support for its clinical and economic effectiveness. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03590470)

Cost–benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data

“…Comparable studies in NHs report only fragments of cost or focus on specific illnesses or items such as hospitalization and have not published any results yet [33,35]. However, data from international studies evaluating similar interventions to reduce hospitalisations or costs also showed promising results [50][51][52]. These interventions focused more on a nurse-led model, than the practitioner-led model in CoCare with its emphasis on communication.…”

Implementation science: accelerating the pharma pipeline to its full potential

“…No definitive business case is yet available for applying implementation science methods to the pharma/biotech pipeline; still, numerous clinical examples illustrate how complex interventions can be sustainably implemented in real-world settings [5,13,14].…”

Evaluating the implementation fidelity to a successful nurse-led model (INTERCARE) which reduced nursing home unplanned hospitalisations

“…The Improving INTERprofessionalCARE for better resident outcomes -the INTERCARE model, comprised six evidence-based core components and was developed within a theory-based implementation science study which relied on a thorough contextual analysis, continuous stakeholder involvement, evidence-based interventions and the development of implementation strategies targeting specific barriers and facilitators [11][12][13]. The INTERCARE model was successful in decreasing unplanned hospitalisations of NH residents [14] as well as cost-effective [15] and highly acceptable from the NH staff 's perspective [16].…”