2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40857-017-0115-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health Effects Related to Wind Turbine Sound, Including Low-Frequency Sound and Infrasound

Abstract: A narrative review of observational and experimental studies was conducted to assess the association between exposure to wind turbine sound and its components and health effects in the general population. Literature databases Scopus, Medline and Embase and additional bibliographic sources such as reference sections of key publications and journal databases were systematically searched for peer-reviewed studies published from 2009 to 2017. For the period until early 2015 only reviews were included, while for th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(194 reference statements)
1
40
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be a consequence of sight and sound from wind turbines disturbing the females in the weeks around parturition. Sound from wind turbines consists of both high-and low-frequency sound, and the latter may carry over longer distances (van Kamp & van den Berg, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be a consequence of sight and sound from wind turbines disturbing the females in the weeks around parturition. Sound from wind turbines consists of both high-and low-frequency sound, and the latter may carry over longer distances (van Kamp & van den Berg, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humans may recognize sound from wind turbines at 1,500 m (Maffei et al, 2015), and depending on sensitivity, it can be experienced as disturbing at 1,000 m or more (van Kamp & van den Berg, 2017;Pierpont, 2009). Reindeer hearing range, tested in a laboratory environment, is similar to human hearing range (Flydal, Hermansen, Enger, & Reimers, 2001); however, we suspect that TA B L E 3 Estimates of resource selection function models of the second-order scale, that is, selection home range, for female reindeer in and around the wind farm sites before (2008-2009) and during construction (2010-2011), and during operation (2015-2016) Notes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There continues to be disagreement among researchers as well as among the general public regarding whether or not wind farms are directly and/or indirectly responsible for adverse health effects [127][128][129][130]. However, it seems that wind farm noise is possibly more easily perceived and, compared with noise from other community sources such as traffic noise, railway noise and aircraft noise, wind farm noise is more annoying [122,[131][132][133]. Annoyance levels are also increased as a result of AM of the noise at the blade pass frequency (BPF), the low-frequency bias of the spectrum [126,134], the existence of tones and, possibly, infrasound.…”
Section: Human Response To Wind Farm Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies in the past have attempted to evaluate the effect of wind farm infrasound on people [116,131,133]. Although these studies have not found that people can perceive the existence of infrasound at the levels typically produced by a wind farm, the studies have a few serious drawbacks, which make the results questionable and point to the need for more work to be undertaken before the question of whether wind farm infrasound can lead to adverse health effects can be answered definitively.…”
Section: Infrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation