Health equity in the New Zealand health care system: a national survey

Abstract

IntroductionIn all countries people experience different social circumstances that result in avoidable differences in health. In New Zealand, Māori, Pacific peoples, and those with lower socioeconomic status experience higher levels of chronic illness, which is the leading cause of mortality, morbidity and inequitable health outcomes. Whilst the health system can enable a fairer distribution of good health, limited national data is available to measure health equity. Therefore, we sought to find out whether health services in New Zealand were equitable by measuring the level of development of components of chronic care management systems across district health boards. Variation in provision by geography, condition or ethnicity can be interpreted as inequitable.MethodsA national survey of district health boards (DHBs) was undertaken on macro approaches to chronic condition management with detail on cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, stroke and diabetes. Additional data from expert informant interviews on program reach and the cultural needs of Māori and Pacific peoples was sought. Survey data were analyzed on dimensions of health equity relevant to strategic planning and program delivery. Results are presented as descriptive statistics and free text. Interviews were transcribed and NVivo 8 software supported a general inductive approach to identify common themes.ResultsSurvey responses were received from the majority of DHBs (15/21), some PHOs (21/84) and 31 expert informants. Measuring, monitoring and targeting equity is not systematically undertaken. The Health Equity Assessment Tool is used in strategic planning but not in decisions about implementing or monitoring disease programs. Variable implementation of evidence-based practices in disease management and multiple funding streams made program implementation difficult. Equity for Māori is embedded in policy, this is not so for other ethnic groups or by geography. Populations that conventional practitioners find hard to reach, despite recognized needs, are often underserved. Nurses and community health workers carried a disproportionate burden of care. Cultural and diversity training is not a condition of employment.ConclusionsThere is a struggle to put equity principles into practice, indicating will without enactment. Equity is not addressed systematically below strategic levels and equity does not shape funding decisions, program development, implementation and monitoring. Equity is not incentivized although examples of exceptional practice, driven by individuals, are evident across New Zealand.

Public Spending on Health and Childhood Mortality in India

“…Second, studies have also shown that public spending favors mostly the better-off rather than the poor (Castro-Leal et al, 2000;Wagstaff, 2002), and that the delivery of health care services remains extremely unequal (Almeida et al, 2000;Sheridan et al, 2011). A study by Mahal et al (2001) revealed that public financed curative health care services in India are more likely to serve richer segments of the population than the poor.…”

Racial Inequities in Cardiovascular Disease in New Zealand

“…Biculturalism has challenged New Zealand society to confront racial inequity and its debate has promoted societal recognition of human rights [57]. New Zealand has struggled to put equity principles into practice, indicating will without enactment.…”

“…New Zealand healthcare has a fractured system of individual authorities with little or no governmental policies to address healthcare inequity and develop synchronous policies across the many DHBs. Detailed planning and the implementation of healthcare policy was devolved to DHBs who often further devolved responsibility to PHOs [57]. Despite inequities being recognised in DHB strategic documentation they have not been addressed systematically below this level.…”

“…Low levels of engagement with primary healthcare providers has been observed in elderly patients of ethnic minorities with chronic disease conditions [57]. Such poor engagement reinforces a sense of powerlessness in the very people who require the greatest support.…”

Pathways to Transform Institutional (and Everyday) Racism in New Zealand

“…To address inequities, she argues, one needs to embed and sustain equity in organisational culture, practice, policies, and systems. Both Sheridan et al (2011) and Cram (2014a, b) have investigated how equity can be enhanced within the context of the health sector.…”