2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health hazards and adoption of personal protective equipment during cotton harvesting in Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
12
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither the likelihood of experiencing pesticide-related symptoms that require medical treatment nor the medical treatment costs differ significantly between self-reported Bt adopters and non-adopters. Mean treatment cost incurred by sample farmers during the last cotton growing season was in a magnitude of Rs 290 per cotton season (1 Pakistani rupee (Rs) was 0.00995 US$ in 2014), which is in line with previous studies [7, 42]. The composition of the average cost of illness is given in Fig 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neither the likelihood of experiencing pesticide-related symptoms that require medical treatment nor the medical treatment costs differ significantly between self-reported Bt adopters and non-adopters. Mean treatment cost incurred by sample farmers during the last cotton growing season was in a magnitude of Rs 290 per cotton season (1 Pakistani rupee (Rs) was 0.00995 US$ in 2014), which is in line with previous studies [7, 42]. The composition of the average cost of illness is given in Fig 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The large health costs associated with chemical pesticide use are in line with previous studies for the cotton sector of Pakistan and elsewhere [7, 18, 20, 42]. Likewise, the finding that Bt cotton adoption can reduce these health costs significantly is in line with earlier research in China and India [2324].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In a study in Ghana, Okoffo et al [ 41 ] found that only 20% of the farmers ignored the need to wear PPE while spraying agrochemicals. The study by Bakhsh et al [ 58 ] also showed low compliance with PPE usage among cotton farmers in Pakistan. In another study among vegetable farmers in Nigeria, Ugwu et al [ 59 ] found that in the course of spraying agrochemicals, 95.3% of the farmers claimed to be using rubber gloves, 83.3% used nose guards, 83.3% used protective clothes, 62.7% worn caps and 60.0% put on face masks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…China, Brazil, South Africa) but is also an important health concern in Europe and the USA [81]. Manual workers in low-or middle-income countries often forego the use of control measures such as personal protective equipment, and this could be a contributor to the differences observed between countries [84][85][86]. Silicosis was first reported in South African gold miners in the early 1900s, and South Africa now has one of the highest rates of silicosis worldwide [87].…”
Section: Silicosismentioning
confidence: 99%