Health Impact and Psychosocial Perceptions among French Medical Residents during the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Lucas, David; Brient, Sandrine; Eveillard, Bisi Moriamo; Gressier, Annabelle; Grand, Tanguy Le; Richard, Pascal; Dewitte, J.-D.; Loddé, Brice

doi:10.3390/ijerph18168413

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Such data have also been reported in other parts of the world [6,14]. We also found that being a medical resident leads to a risk of stress, mental health impacts, and a negative perception of the organizational context and work demands [15].…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 86%

“…The occupational health service proposed a project that was accepted by all members of the hygiene and security committee. We assessed an online cross-sectional study of all professionals at the hospital [15,17]. The survey was conducted between 1 July 2020 and 31 August 2020 and involved all workers employed in a teaching hospital in France.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evolution of Global Health and Psychosocial Factors among Hospital Workers during First Year of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study

Lucas

Brient

Grand

et al. 2022

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To assess trends in overall health (mental and physical) and psychosocial factors in a population of workers (both healthcare and non-healthcare) in a French teaching hospital during the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in France. Methods: A validated version of the SATIN questionnaire with adapted scoring was used to collect data on health and impacts of work stressors. This questionnaire was sent to all workers at the hospital in T1 (July–August 2020) and T2 (July–August 2021) and self-administered online. Results: A total of 1313 participants who completed the questionnaire at T1 and 826 at T2 were included. Overall, 568 workers completed the questionnaire at T1 and T2. We found a deterioration in overall health and especially stress and mental health in hospital workers and healthcare workers (HCWs), with a negative impact of the workload and work environment. Conclusions: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic impacted negatively the mental health, work stressors, and psychosocial perceptions of both HCW and non-HCW in a French hospital. The study confirms that hospital workers are an important target.

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of Global Health and Psychosocial Factors among Hospital Workers during First Year of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study

Lucas

Brient

Grand

et al. 2022

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Gender sensitivity of the COVID-19 mental health research in Europe: a scoping review

López-Atanes,

Sáenz-Herrero,

Zach

et al. 2024

Int J Equity Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The integration of sex and gender aspects into the research process has been recognized as crucial to the generation of valid data. During the coronavirus pandemic, a great deal of research addressed the mental state of hospital staff, as they constituted a population at risk for infection and distress. However, it is still unknown how the gender dimension was included. We aimed to appraise and measure qualitatively the extent of gender sensitivity. Methods In this scoping review, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL PsycINFO and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) from database inception to November 11, 2021. All quantitative studies with primary data published in English, German, or Spanish and based in the European Union were selected. Included studies had to have assessed the mental health of hospital staff using validated psychometric scales for depression, anxiety, PTSD symptoms, distress, suicidal behavior, insomnia, substance abuse or aggressive behavior. Two independent reviewers applied eligibility criteria to each title/abstract reviewed, to the full text of the article, and performed the data extraction. A gender sensitivity assessment tool was developed and validated, consisting of 18 items followed by a final qualitative assessment. Two independent reviewers assessed the gender dimension of each included article. Results Three thousand one hundred twelve studies were identified, of which 72 were included in the analysis. The most common design was cross-sectional (75.0%) and most of them were conducted in Italy (31.9%). Among the results, only one study assessed suicidal behaviors and none substance abuse disorders or aggressive behaviors. Sex and gender were used erroneously in 83.3% of the studies, and only one study described how the gender of the participants was determined. Most articles (71.8%) did not include sex/gender in the literature review and did not discuss sex/gender-related findings with a gender theoretical background (86.1%). In the analysis, 37.5% provided sex/gender disaggregated data, but only 3 studies performed advanced modeling statistics, such as interaction analysis. In the overall assessment, 3 papers were rated as good in terms of gender sensitivity, and the rest as fair (16.7%) and poor (79.2%). Three papers were identified in which gender stereotypes were present in explaining the results. None of the papers analyzed the results of non-binary individuals. Conclusions Studies on the mental health of hospital staff during the pandemic did not adequately integrate the gender dimension, despite the institutional commitment of the European Union and the gendered effect of the pandemic. In the development of future mental health interventions for this population, the use and generalizability of current evidence should be done cautiously.

show abstract

Influence of exposure to psychosocial risks on occupational stress among telemedicine agents in Quito

Morillo Cano,

Navarrete Medina,

Noroña Salcedo

et al. 2024

Data and Metadata

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Psychosocial risks are workplace conditions that impact the physical, mental, and social health of workers. This study analyzes the relationship between psychosocial risks and occupational stress among telemedicine agents in Quito. The objective was to determine the extent to which exposure to psychosocial risks influences occupational stress in this population. A non-experimental, cross-sectional, and correlational design was used, with the participation of 91 telemedicine agents selected based on predefined criteria. Using a survey technique, two instruments were applied: The Psychosocial Risk Factors Questionnaire and the adapted OIT-OMS Occupational Stress Scale. The hypothesis proposed a positive correlation between the variables, and the Tau-b Kendall test was used for inferential analysis. The results showed that 57.2% of participants presented high exposure to psychosocial factors, with job demands, workplace conditions, and workload identified as the most frequent dimensions. Additionally, 42.9% of agents reported some level of stress, mainly related to deficiencies in leadership, lack of group cohesion, and adverse organizational conditions. The Tau-b Kendall correlation coefficient was 0.806, indicating a strong association between the variables. It is concluded that psychosocial risks have a significant relationship with occupational stress and that their mitigation could reduce stress by up to 31.14%, highlighting the need for specific interventions to improve the work environment and the well-being of employees

show abstract

Health Impact and Psychosocial Perceptions among French Medical Residents during the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Cited by 3 publications

References 32 publications

Evolution of Global Health and Psychosocial Factors among Hospital Workers during First Year of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study

Evolution of Global Health and Psychosocial Factors among Hospital Workers during First Year of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study

Gender sensitivity of the COVID-19 mental health research in Europe: a scoping review

Influence of exposure to psychosocial risks on occupational stress among telemedicine agents in Quito

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About