2021
DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health impact of tafamidis in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy patients: an analysis from the Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT) and the open-label long-term extension studies

Abstract: Aim The Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT) showed that tafamidis reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). This study aimed to estimate the impact of tafamidis on survival and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Methods and results A multi-state, cohort, Markov model was developed to simulate the di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous analyses have demonstrated the value of long-term tafamidis treatment. 12,[22][23][24] These latest findings support previous data demonstrating that patients who received placebo in ATTR-ACT continued to have poorer survival in the LTE than those who initially received tafamidis. ATTR-ACT was not designed to assess efficacy in NYHA subgroups; however, pre-specified exploratory analyses have previously indicated a reduction in all-cause mortality with pooled tafamidis (80 and 20 mg) versus placebo in NYHA subgroups I-III.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Previous analyses have demonstrated the value of long-term tafamidis treatment. 12,[22][23][24] These latest findings support previous data demonstrating that patients who received placebo in ATTR-ACT continued to have poorer survival in the LTE than those who initially received tafamidis. ATTR-ACT was not designed to assess efficacy in NYHA subgroups; however, pre-specified exploratory analyses have previously indicated a reduction in all-cause mortality with pooled tafamidis (80 and 20 mg) versus placebo in NYHA subgroups I-III.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In ATTR-ACT and the open-label extension, tafamidis was shown to more than double the life expectancy (6.73 vs 2.85 years) and quality-adjusted life-years in patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis vs standard of care . Although there was no interaction with NYHA class and all-cause mortality in ATTR-ACT, patients with NYHA class III symptoms had more cardiovascular-related hospitalizations in the tafamidis cohort ( P < .001 for interaction) compared with class II.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…6 A moderate increase in life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) was observed in the model for patients with NYHA class III when placebo was compared with pooled tafamidis use (20 and 80 mg), respectively from 2.4 to 2.8 life-years and 1.6 to 2.1 QALY, larger improvements were observed in the model for NYHA class I and II from 3.1 to 8.6 life-years and from 2.3 to 7.0 QALY. 7 When interpreting the current study by Elliott et al in the context of the value of tafamidis in patients with NYHA III symptoms, it is relevant to note that the control group was treated with tafamidis for a large part of the follow-up time. This probably resulted in underestimation of the effect of tafamidis.…”
Section: For the Continuously Treated Group (95% Confidence Intervalmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…With regard to functionality, patients in NYHA III were 2.7 times more likely to have a 10 point improvement (95% CI 1.1–6.6; p = 0.03) in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score after 30 months of tafamidis treatment compared to placebo 6 . A moderate increase in life‐years and quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALY) was observed in the model for patients with NYHA class III when placebo was compared with pooled tafamidis use (20 and 80 mg), respectively from 2.4 to 2.8 life‐years and 1.6 to 2.1 QALY, larger improvements were observed in the model for NYHA class I and II from 3.1 to 8.6 life‐years and from 2.3 to 7.0 QALY 7 …”
mentioning
confidence: 97%