This article refers to 'Improved long-term survival with tafamidis treatment in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy and severe heart failure symptoms' by P. Elliott et al., published in this issue on pages 2060-2064.In 2018 the results of the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT) were published. 1 In this international, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial involving 441 patients, the safety and efficacy of tafamidis for the treatment of transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) was assessed. Tafamidis, a disease-modifying therapy for the treatment of ATTR-CM, demonstrated a significant survival and functional benefit compared to placebo. Based on subgroup analyses, the survival benefit seemed to be mainly driven by patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes I and II heart failure (HF). Paradoxically, cardiovascular hospitalizations were increased in patients with NYHA class III HF treated with tafamidis versus placebo. Consequently, tafamidis is an accepted treatment for patients with ATTR-CM and NYHA classes I/II, but the value in patients with severe HF symptoms remains subject of debate.In this issue of the Journal, Elliott et al. 2 provide a much-needed addition to the existing literature by analysing the effect of tafamidis on long-term all-cause mortality in patients with ATTR-CM and NYHA class III in the ATTR-ACT and its long-term extension (LTE) study. In this sub-study, 55 patients with NYHA class III treated continuously with tafamidis 80 mg (median follow-up 60 months) were compared with 63 patients with NYHA class III that received placebo during 30 months of the ATTR-ACT and started on 80 or 20 mg tafamidis in the LTE (median follow-up 56 months). Both groups transitioned to the approved dosage of 61 mg tafamidis free acid, which is bioequivalent to tafamidis meglumine 80 mg, at the time of a protocol amendment in July 2018. Fewer patients died in the continuously treated group versus the placebo-to-tafamidis group (64% vs. 81%). The hazard ratio for all-cause mortality wasThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Journal of Heart Failure or of the European Society of Cardiology.