Health inequities in the diagnosis and outcome of sepsis in Argentina: a prospective cohort study

Abstract

Background Socioeconomic variables impact health outcomes but have rarely been evaluated in critical illness. Low- and middle-income countries bear the highest burden of sepsis and also have significant health inequities. In Argentina, public hospitals serve the poorest segment of the population, while private institutions serve patients with health coverage. Our objective was to analyze differences in mortality between public and private hospitals, using Sepsis-3 definitions. Methods This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study including patients with sepsis admitted to 49 Argentine ICUs lasting 3 months, beginning on July 1, 2016. Epidemiological, clinical, and socioeconomic status variables and hospital characteristics were compared between patients admitted to both types of institutions. Results Of the 809 patients included, 367 (45%) and 442 (55%) were admitted to public and private hospitals, respectively. Those in public institutions were younger (56 ± 18 vs. 64 ± 18; p < 0.01), with more comorbidities (Charlson score 2 [0–4] vs. 1 [0–3]; p < 0.01), fewer education years (7 [7–12] vs. 12 [10–16]; p < 0.01), more frequently unemployed/informally employed (30% vs. 7%; p < 0.01), had similar previous self-rated health status (70 [50–90] vs. 70 [50–90] points; p = 0.30), longer pre-admission symptoms (48 [24–96] vs. 24 [12–48] h; p < 0.01), had been previously evaluated more frequently in any healthcare venue (28 vs. 20%; p < 0.01), and had higher APACHE II, SOFA, lactate levels, and mechanical ventilation utilization. ICU admission as septic shock was more frequent in patients admitted to public hospitals (47 vs. 35%; p < 0.01), as were infections caused by multiresistant microorganisms. Sepsis management in the ICU showed no differences. Twenty-eight-day mortality was higher in public hospitals (42% vs. 24%; p < 0.01) as was hospital mortality (47% vs. 30%; p < 0.01). Admission to a public hospital was an independent predictor of mortality together with comorbidities, lactate, SOFA, and mechanical ventilation; in an alternative prediction model, it acted as a correlate of pre-hospital symptom duration and infections caused by multiresistant microorganisms. Conclusions Patients in public hospitals belonged to a socially disadvantaged group and were sicker at admission, had septic shock more frequently, and had higher mortality. Unawareness of disease severity and delays in the health system might be associated with late admission. This marked difference in outcome between patients served by public and private institutions constitutes a state of health inequity. Electronic supplementary material The online versi...

Characteristics of resuscitation, and association between use of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness and outcomes in septic patients: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study in Argentina

“…Briefly, SATISEPSIS was a national, multicenter, prospective cohort study organized by the SATI and sponsored by the Argentine National Ministry of Health, beginning on July 2, 2016 and lasting for 3 months [14,15]. The study was approved by each hospital's Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was signed by patients or their relatives.…”

“…SATISEPSIS was an observational study organized by the Argentine Society of Critical Care (Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva, SATI) to evaluate the performance of the new Sepsis-3 definitions [13], and to characterize the epidemiology and outcome of sepsis and septic shock in Argentina, a country belonging to the group of low and middle-income countries (LMICs) [14,15]. The aim of the present study was to assess the characteristics of the cardiovascular management, particularly regarding early resuscitation and use of intravenous fluids.…”

Budget impact analysis of using procalcitonin to optimize antimicrobial treatment for patients with suspected sepsis in the intensive care unit and hospitalized lower respiratory tract infections in Argentina

“…Sepsis is one of the major causes of mortality worldwide and reports of its incidence are rising [ 6 ]. According to economic studies, the financial burden for healthcare systems is considerable; in the United States (US), sepsis accounted for more than 5% of total hospital costs in 2011 ($16.7 billion US dollars [USD]) [ 7 ], and this figure is expected to be even higher in Latin America, as public health conditions are heterogeneous and there is considerable inequality in access to healthcare [ 8 – 11 ]. Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) mainly include community-acquired pneumonia, mechanical ventilator-associated pneumonia, and acute exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.…”

Association of Health Insurance Status with Outcomes of Sepsis in Adult Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

“…Various demographic and socioeconomic factors, including age, sex, race, comorbidities, health insurance, residence, and neighborhood, affect disparities in the accessibility of medical treatment and clinical outcomes in sepsis [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Because sepsis is a lethal disease that requires early and aggressive intense management and medical costs of sepsis treatment are very high [ 1 ], socioeconomic factors are important in access to sepsis treatment and outcomes in sepsis.…”