Health information on the internet

Sethuram, Ramya; Weerakkody, Asoka

doi:10.3109/01443610903440927

Cited by 24 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is an opportunity for physicians to direct patients to medically appropriate ''preapproved'' web sites. Sethuram and Weerakkody also emphasized the Internet's capabilities of educating patients with appropriate physician guidance 36 . As a result, we developed a list of the top five web sites used in our study with the highest overall accuracy and quality, and we provided a quick link in a handout for physicians to distribute (Fig.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Online Resources for Shoulder Instability: What Are Patients Reading?

Garcia

Taylor

et al. 2014

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Online Resources for Shoulder Instability: What Are Patients Reading?

Garcia

Taylor

et al. 2014

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[51][52][53][54] Encouraging patients to discuss their Internet findings with their doctors would be a way of improving this situation; however, doctors often feel that the patient who brings information retrieved from the web to discuss is challenging their authority, and that they make the visit less time-efficient. 55 If consumers have difficulties appraising and discussing the information they find on the web with their doctors, they may end up making uncritical healthcare decisions based on non-evidence-based information.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Googling caesarean section: a survey on the quality of the information available on the Internet

Fioretti

Reiter

Betrán

et al. 2014

BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To examine the quality and completeness of information on caesarean section in web pages used by laypersons in Brazil, a country with very high rates of caesarean delivery.Design Cross-sectional study.Setting Brazil.Sample A total of 176 Internet websites.Methods The term 'caesarean delivery' and 25 synonyms were entered into the most popular search engines in Brazil. The first three pages of hits were downloaded and assessed by two independent investigators using the DISCERN instrument and a content checklist.Main outcome measures Quality and completeness of information on caesarean section.Results A total of 3900 web pages were retrieved and 176 fulfilled the selection criteria. The overall average DISCERN score was 43.6 (AE8.9 SD), of a maximum score of 75; 30% of the pages were of poor or very poor quality and 47% were of moderate quality. Most pages scored low, especially in questions related to reliability of the information. The most frequently covered topics were: indications for caesarean section (80% of websites), which did not reflect clinical practice; short-term maternal risks (80%); and potential benefits of caesarean section (56%), including maternal and doctor convenience. Less than half of the websites mentioned perinatal risks and less than one-third mentioned long-term maternal risks associated with caesarean section, such as uterine rupture (17%) or placenta praevia/accreta (12%) in future pregnancies.Conclusions The quality and completeness of web-based resources in Portuguese about caesarean section were poor to moderate. Pending improvement of these resources, obstetricians should warn pregnant women about these facts and encourage them to discuss what they have read on the Internet about caesarean section.Keywords Caesarean section, doctor-patient relationships, health literacy, Internet, patient education, prenatal education.Tweetable abstract The quality and completeness of information about caesareans is poor in 176 websites used by Brazilians.Keywords Caesarean section, doctor-patient relationships, health literacy, Internet, patient education, prenatal education. IntroductionIn 1985, the World Health Organization (WHO) stated that there were no justifications for caesarean section rates higher than 10-15% anywhere in the world, 1 and yet rates are steadily increasing worldwide.2 Brazil has been the world champion of delivery by caesarean section since the early 1990s, 3 and numbers continue to rise. In 2010 over 50% of all deliveries in Brazil were by caesarean section, representing a 20% increase in just 4 years. 4,5 In the private sector, caesarean section rates are over 80%. 6,7 Reasons for increasing caesarean section rates are under investigation. Several contributing factors from both the health provider and user sides have been identified, including fear of labour pain, misconceptions about vaginal delivery, previous traumatic births, social values, personal preferences, fear of litigation, economic reasons, and convenience for both patients and doctors. [8][9][10][...

show abstract

“…This can lead to potentially misleading or frankly dangerous advice. 7,8 YouTube has been evaluated as a source of information on various topics, including prostate cancer, 9 flu pandemics 10 and human papillomavirus immunisation. 11 However, within the literature, there have been no such studies in relation to otorhinolaryngological conditions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%