2008
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-07-2760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health Insurance–Related Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Virginia

Abstract: Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain low in the United States. The effect of health insurance on CRC screening is not clear. We assessed the association between having health insurance and being screened for CRC and the factors that modify this association. Methods: We used data from the 2005 Virginia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to evaluate the association of self-reported insurance coverage on selfreported CRC screening among all men and women ages z50 years (N = 2,887). P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, type of insurance has been shown to impact access to cancer screening, treatment, and outcomes. 27,28 Other social and lifestyle factors, including drug and alcohol abuse, psychiatric illness, obesity, and high-risk behavior, may further contribute to differences in payer group populations. The impact of the economic burden of poverty may also influence patients’ ability to seek medical care and to be discharged from the hospital in a timely manner due to lack of support and resources to be cared for properly at home.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, type of insurance has been shown to impact access to cancer screening, treatment, and outcomes. 27,28 Other social and lifestyle factors, including drug and alcohol abuse, psychiatric illness, obesity, and high-risk behavior, may further contribute to differences in payer group populations. The impact of the economic burden of poverty may also influence patients’ ability to seek medical care and to be discharged from the hospital in a timely manner due to lack of support and resources to be cared for properly at home.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Medicaid and Uninsured populations often present with more advanced disease compared to privately insured patients, and patient insurance type has been shown to affect access to cancer screening, treatment, and outcomes. 44, 45 Payer status may also effect hospital discharge processes as discharge from the hospital may be delayed for Medicaid and Uninsured populations due to lack of support and resources to be cared for properly at home. Regarding the Uninsured population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, fewer diagnostic studies during emergency department visits and decreased in-patient hospitalizations following specialty consultations have been documented for these populations compared to private insurance patients 30. Furthermore, Medicaid and Uninsured populations often present with more advanced disease compared to privately insured patients, and patient insurance type has been shown to affect access to cancer screening, treatment, and outcomes 31, 32. Payer status may also effect hospital discharge processes as discharge from the hospital may be delayed for Medicaid and Uninsured populations due to lack of support and resources to be cared for properly at home.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%