2009
DOI: 10.1056/nejmhpr0808703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health Insurers and Medical-Imaging Policy — A Work in Progress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
177
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
177
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of a clear demonstration of an effect on outcomes has led to calls for regulation aimed at controlling spending and improving quality 46, 47. Little comparative effectiveness research has been published on differing initial noninvasive diagnostic strategies that are currently available to clinicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a clear demonstration of an effect on outcomes has led to calls for regulation aimed at controlling spending and improving quality 46, 47. Little comparative effectiveness research has been published on differing initial noninvasive diagnostic strategies that are currently available to clinicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the most obvious of these limitations is the fact that a large percentage of medical imaging studies are exempt from these quality standards, including general radiography which still accounts for the majority of medical imaging exams [1,2]. In addition, these exempt imaging exams are often performed in facilities supervised by non-radiologists, which in theory heightens concerns over image quality and patient safety [3].…”
Section: Limitations and Deficienciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 Advances in imaging techniques generally increase, rather than reduce, healthcare expenditures. 49 In this era of increasing healthcare expenses, physicians are bound to take the costs of each imaging modality into account. The more so, when the results of previous scans may include the purpose of any additional scan.…”
Section: Pre-operative Assessment Of the Level Of The Dominant Performentioning
confidence: 99%