Background:
Research indicates that the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) physical distancing mandates is influenced by several individual factors, including health literacy; internal health locus of control (IHLOC), the belief that physical distancing can reduce COVID-19 risk; social norms; self-efficacy; and perceptions of the benefits and barriers associated with distancing. However, further investigation is needed to understand the links between these factors and compliance intentions.
Objective:
This study investigates the mechanism linking these factors with the intentions to comply with physical distancing mandates.
Methods:
A total of 759 participants (Mean age = 29.13, standard deviation [
SD
] = 8.33; 68.5% women) were surveyed online from September 2020 to October 2020. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (analysis of variance) and structural equation modeling.
Key Results:
Health literacy was associated with more perceived benefits (
β
= .175,
p
= .001), greater self-efficacy (
β
= .193,
p
< .001), and less perceived barriers (β = −.391,
p
< .001). IHLOC was significantly associated with greater perceived benefits (
β
= .156,
p
= .007) and self-efficacy (
β
= .294,
p
< .001). Family descriptive norms were significantly associated with fewer perceived barriers (β = −.276,
p
< .001), while injunctive norms were associated with more perceived benefits (
β
= .202,
p
= .001) and higher self-efficacy (
β
= .299,
p
< .001). Intentions to adhere to physical distancing mandates were significantly associated with past compliance (
β
= .427,
p
< .001) and perceived barriers (β = −.205,
p
< .001) and benefits (
β
= .295,
p
< .001). Post-hoc mediation analyses revealed several small yet significant indirect effects, highlighting the complex pathways shaping adherence intentions.
Conclusions:
This study identifies how health literacy, IHLOC, social norms, perceived benefits and barriers, and self-efficacy intricately shape intentions to comply with physical distancing mandates. These findings offer valuable implications for public health policy and interventions. [
HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice
. 2024;8(2):e69–e78.
]