2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01684-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health management information system (HMIS) data quality and associated factors in Massaguet district, Chad

Abstract: Background Quality data from Health Management Information Systems (HMIS) are important for tracking the effectiveness of malaria control interventions. However, HMIS data in many resource-limited settings do not currently meet standards set by the World Health Organization (WHO). We aimed to assess HMIS data quality and associated factors in Chad. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in 14 health facilities in Massaguet district. Data on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, while pilots of digital tools for improving timeliness of malaria case data collection have been explored [25][26][27][28], difficulty with scaling and challenges in reporting timeliness as discussed in the breakout group highlight its persistent impact on NMCP's ability to implement targeted and timely responses to outbreaks. While the GTS has emphasized the importance of highquality routine data by redefining surveillance as a core intervention in malaria control and elimination [4], there have been limited efforts to evaluate programmes' ability to capture quality routine malaria surveillance data when compared to Africa [29][30][31][32][33]. High quality of routine surveillance data and integration of various sources and types of data are needed to provide a complete picture of malaria incidence within a country in order to successfully plan for malaria control and elimination and inform targeted response strategies.…”
Section: Discussion and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while pilots of digital tools for improving timeliness of malaria case data collection have been explored [25][26][27][28], difficulty with scaling and challenges in reporting timeliness as discussed in the breakout group highlight its persistent impact on NMCP's ability to implement targeted and timely responses to outbreaks. While the GTS has emphasized the importance of highquality routine data by redefining surveillance as a core intervention in malaria control and elimination [4], there have been limited efforts to evaluate programmes' ability to capture quality routine malaria surveillance data when compared to Africa [29][30][31][32][33]. High quality of routine surveillance data and integration of various sources and types of data are needed to provide a complete picture of malaria incidence within a country in order to successfully plan for malaria control and elimination and inform targeted response strategies.…”
Section: Discussion and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while pilots of digital tools for improving timeliness of malaria case data collection have been explored(25-28), di culty with scaling and challenges in reporting timeliness as discussed in the breakout group highlight its persistent impact on NMCP's ability to implement targeted and timely responses to outbreaks. While the GTS has emphasized the importance of high-quality routine data by rede ning surveillance as a core intervention in malaria control and elimination(5), there have been limited efforts to evaluate programmes' ability to capture quality routine malaria surveillance data when compared to Africa (29)(30)(31)(32)(33). High quality of routine surveillance data and integration of various sources and types of data is needed to provide a complete picture of malaria incidence within a country in order to successfully plan for malaria control and elimination and inform targeted response strategies.…”
Section: Discussion and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HMIS data are known for quality issues, including completeness, internal or external consistency and outliers. [26][27][28] We used a five-step process guided by WHO methodology for HMIS data cleaning. 29 The steps included running quality checks to determine reporting rates, completion rates, outliers and missing data, data aggregation, analysis and reporting (online supplemental material figure 1).…”
Section: Methodology Datamentioning
confidence: 99%